Biomechanical modelling and computer aided simulation of deep brain retraction in neurosurgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Surgical simulators are widely used to promote faster and safer surgical training. They not only provide a platform for enhancing surgical skills but also minimize risks to the patient's safety, operation theatre usage, and financial expenditure. Retracting the soft brain tissue is an unavoidable procedure during any surgery to access the lesioned tissue deep within the brain. Excessive retraction often results in damaging the brain tissue, thus requiring advanced skills and prior training using virtual platforms. Such surgical simulation platforms require an anatomically correct computational model that can accurately predict the brain deformation in real-time. METHODS In this study, we present a 3D finite element brain model reconstructed from MRI dataset. The model incorporates precisely the anatomy and geometrical features of the canine brain. The brain model has been used to formulate and solve a quasi-static boundary value problem for brain deformation during brain retraction. The visco-hyperelastic framework within the theory of non-linear elasticity has been used to set up the boundary value problem. Consequently, the derived non-linear field equations have been solved using finite element solver ABAQUS. RESULTS The retraction simulations have been performed for two scenarios: retraction pressure in the brain and forces required to perform the surgery. The brain was retracted by 5 mm and retained at that position for 30 minutes, during which the retraction pressure attenuates to 36% of its peak value. Both the model predictions as well as experimental observations on canine brain indicate that brain retraction up to 30 minutes did not cause any significant risk of induced damage. Also, the peak retraction pressure level indicates that intermittent retraction is a safer procedure as compared to the continuous retraction, for the same extent of retraction. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study indicate the potential of a visco-hyperelastic framework for simulating deep brain retraction effectively. The simulations were able to capture the dominant characteristics of brain tissue undergoing retraction. The developed platform could serve as a basis for the development of a detailed model in the future that can eventually be used for effective preoperative planning and training purposes.

[1]  R L Stalnaker,et al.  A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modeling of brain tissue. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  J. Rosenørn,et al.  Reduction of regional cerebral blood flow during brain retraction pressure in the rat. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  Ole Vilhelm Larsen,et al.  Modelling of interaction between a spatula and a human brain , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Modeling of Retraction and Resection for Intraoperative Updating of Images , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[5]  Y. Maréchal,et al.  Toward Real-Time Finite-Element Simulation on GPU , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  A Digital Atlas of the Dog Brain , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Laurent Stainier,et al.  Model-Free Data-Driven Inelasticity , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[8]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: A review , 2010, Clinical anatomy.

[9]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Non-linear anisotropic elasticity for real-time surgery simulation , 2003, Graph. Model..

[11]  S. Kobayashi,et al.  Clinical study of brain retraction in different approaches and diseases , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[12]  S. Kobayashi,et al.  Intermittent versus continuous brain retraction. An experimental study. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  Manuel Dujovny,et al.  Brain retraction injury , 2003, Neurological research.

[14]  Trenton Kirchdoerfer,et al.  Data-driven computational mechanics , 2015, 1510.04232.

[15]  Weiwei Wang,et al.  In Vivo Investigation of the Effectiveness of a Hyper-viscoelastic Model in Simulating Brain Retraction , 2016, Scientific reports.

[16]  J. Rossmeisl,et al.  Companion animal models of neurological disease , 2019, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  Xiaohong Jia,et al.  Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  In vivo quantification of a homogeneous brain deformation model for updating preoperative images during surgery , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  J. Clymer,et al.  Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, The Journal of surgical research.

[20]  B. L. Bauer,et al.  Pontine hemorrhage. Author's reply , 2003 .

[21]  Martin Ostoja-Starzewski,et al.  Finite Element Methods in Human Head Impact Simulations: A Review , 2019, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  S. Herculano‐Houzel,et al.  Dogs Have the Most Neurons, Though Not the Largest Brain: Trade-Off between Body Mass and Number of Neurons in the Cerebral Cortex of Large Carnivoran Species , 2017, Front. Neuroanat..

[23]  J. Bartek,et al.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods—A Review , 2012, Critical care research and practice.

[24]  M. Dujovny,et al.  Evoked Potential Changes During Brain Retraction in Dogs , 1977, Stroke.

[25]  B. Bell,et al.  CBF and time thresholds for the formation of ischemic cerebral edema, and effect of reperfusion in baboons. , 1985, Journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Canis familiaris As a Model for Non-Invasive Comparative Neuroscience , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  John Bringas,et al.  A review of brain retraction and recommendations for minimizing intraoperative brain injury. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[28]  S Kobayashi,et al.  Monitoring retraction pressure on the brain. An experimental and clinical study. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[29]  Paul Steinmann,et al.  Fifty Shades of Brain: A Review on the Mechanical Testing and Modeling of Brain Tissue , 2019, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[30]  Dr. KAROL Miller Technical Note: Modelling Soft Tissue Using Biphasic Theory - A Word of Caution. , 1998, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[31]  Chenxi Zhang,et al.  A framework for correcting brain retraction based on an eXtended Finite Element Method using a laser range scanner , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[32]  Atsushi Konno,et al.  GPU-accelerated surgery simulation for opening a brain fissure , 2015, ROBOMECH Journal.

[33]  K. Miller,et al.  Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  M. Dujovny,et al.  Cerebellar retraction: significance and sequelae. , 1979, Surgical Neurology.