Benchmarking road safety: lessons to learn from a data envelopment analysis.

Road safety performance indicators (SPI) have recently been proposed as a useful instrument in comparing countries on the performance of different risk aspects of their road safety system. In this respect, SPIs should be actionable, i.e. they should provide clear directions for policymakers about what action is needed and which priorities should be set in order to improve a country's road safety level in the most efficient way. This paper aims at contributing to this issue by proposing a computational model based on data envelopment analysis (DEA). Based on the model output, the good and bad aspects of road safety are identified for each country. Moreover, targets and priorities for policy actions can be set. As our data set contains 21 European countries for which a separate, best possible model is constructed, a number of country-specific policy actions can be recommended. Conclusions are drawn regarding the following performance indicators: alcohol and drugs, speed, protective systems, vehicle, infrastructure and trauma management. For each country that performs relatively poor, a particular country will be assigned as a useful benchmark.

[1]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Building the European Road Safety Observatory. SafetyNet. Deliverable D3.1 State of the art report on road safety performance indicators , 2005 .

[2]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The independent contribution of driver, crash, and vehicle characteristics to driver fatalities. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Toru Nakamura WHITE PAPER, European transport policy for 2010 : time to decide , 2004 .

[4]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[5]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[6]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[7]  Geert Wets,et al.  Combining road safety information in a performance index. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Jasper Becker,et al.  Joint Research Centre , 1982, Nature.

[11]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[12]  C. Lovell,et al.  One Market, One Number? A Composite Indicator Assessment of EU Internal Market Dynamics , 2005 .

[13]  Rune Elvik Speed and Road Safety: Synthesis of Evidence from Evaluation Studies , 2005 .

[14]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[15]  Pascal Wolff,et al.  EU sustainable development indicators: An overview , 2005 .

[16]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  A taxonomy for data envelopment analysis , 2004 .

[17]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Safety Effects of Speed Limit Changes: Use of Panel Models, Including Speed, Use, and Design Variables , 2005 .

[18]  Tom Brijs,et al.  Developing a Theoretical Framework for Road Safety Performance Indicators and a Methodology for Creating a Performance Index , 2008 .

[19]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .