Comparing Channel Emulation Algorithms by Using Plane Waves and Spherical Vector Waves in Multiprobe Anechoic Chamber Setups

This paper evaluates the performances of channel emulation algorithms in the multiprobe anechoic chamber (MPAC) by using plane wave (PW) and spherical vector wave (SVW) theories. Channel emulation in MPAC enables the over-the-air (OTA) testing of performances of wireless devices under realistic propagation scenarios, through setting excitation voltages of probes and utilizing the polarized radiation patterns, locations, and orientations of probe antennas to emulate desired fields in test zone. Accurate emulation of radio wave propagation in target scenario guarantees that the device under test (DUT) be assessed fairly in the laboratory. Dynamic multipath scenario and orthogonal polarization can be emulated by exciting the multiple probes in such a way that the total fields from probes resemble the target impinging field in the test zone. The excitation voltages can be either calculated by PW or SVW theories. Despite the fact that PW and SVW are mathematically equal in the far field, different treatments on rotation and translation of waves as well as different linear equations used in two methods result in different computed voltages, hence, different emulated fields. The emulation performances of the two methods with different MPAC setups (e.g., test zone size, probe number, probe sphere radius, and probe directivity) are investigated. Both scenarios of the 2-D field emulation with the 2-D probe configuration and the 3-D (or 2.5-D) field emulation with the 3-D probe configuration are discussed, and instructions on how to wisely use the emulation algorithm are provided.

[1]  Xiaoming Chen Throughput Modeling and Measurement in an Isotropic-Scattering Reverberation Chamber , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[2]  T. Laitinen,et al.  On appropriate probe configurations for practical MIMO over-the-air testing of wireless devices , 2012, 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[3]  Jun-ichi Takada,et al.  Antenna De-Embedding of Radio Propagation Channel With Truncated Modes in the Spherical Vector Wave Domain , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[4]  Jun-ichi Takada,et al.  Pattern Reconstruction for Deviated AUT in Spherical Measurement by Using Spherical Waves , 2014, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Wei Fan,et al.  On Channel Emulation Methods in Multiprobe Anechoic Chamber Setups for Over-the-Air Testing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Markus Berg,et al.  Experimental Verification of a Plane-Wave Field Synthesis Technique for MIMO OTA Antenna Testing , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[7]  Miguel Ferrando-Bataller,et al.  Wideband Dual-Polarized Cross-Shaped Vivaldi Antenna , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[8]  Wei Fan,et al.  Verification of emulated channels in multi-probe based MIMO OTA testing setup , 2013, 2013 7th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[9]  Pekka Kyosti,et al.  Emulating Ray-Tracing Channels in Multiprobe Anechoic Chamber Setups for Virtual Drive Testing , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[10]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  A geometry-based stochastic MIMO model for vehicle-to-vehicle communications , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  P. Kyosti,et al.  Criteria for physical dimensions of MIMO OTA multi-probe test setup , 2012, 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[12]  Clive Parini,et al.  Spherical near-field antenna measurements , 2014, Theory and Practice of Modern Antenna Range Measurements, 2nd Expanded Edition, Volume 2.

[13]  M. B. Knudsen,et al.  Emulating Spatial Characteristics of MIMO Channels for OTA Testing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[14]  P. Kildal,et al.  Characterization of Reverberation Chambers for OTA Measurements of Wireless Devices: Physical Formulations of Channel Matrix and New Uncertainty Formula , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[15]  Jun-ichi Takada,et al.  Antenna Deembedding in WBAN Channel Modeling Using Spherical Wave Functions , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[16]  Pertti Vainikainen,et al.  Reproduction of Arbitrary Multipath Environments in Laboratory Conditions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[17]  Afroza Khatun,et al.  Dependence of Error Level on the Number of Probes in Over-the-Air Multiprobe Test Systems , 2012 .

[18]  Pekka Kyosti,et al.  Channel Modelling for Multiprobe Over-the-Air MIMO Testing , 2012 .

[19]  A. Khatun,et al.  Probe configurations for 3D MIMO Over-the-Air testing , 2013, 2013 7th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[20]  B. Derat 5G antenna characterization in the far-field: How close can far-field be? , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility and 2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC/APEMC).