One Size Fits All? Teacher Appraisal in a Chinese Culture

In this article we suggest that the penetration of Western policies and practices—in particular, teacher appraisal—into Asian cultural contexts needs to be questioned. We begin by making a general case for considering the influence of societal culture on educational policies and practices, and a more specific argument for assessing its role in the implementation of teacher appraisal in different cultures. We argue that it may be unwise simply to clone appraisal practices in contexts and cultures quite different from those in which they are chartered. The study briefly reviews the status of teacher appraisal in Hong Kong, given that in the next few years all Hong Kong schools must implement appraisal schemes, a fact causing considerable consternation. We then suggest that the most common forms of appraisal being promoted and implemented in Hong Kong are based on traditional Anglo-American understandings and practices. This leads to a discussion of the possible influence exerted by culture on teacher appraisal in the Chinese society of Hong Kong. Noteworthy features of Hong Kong's culture are collectivism and high power distance, both of which are sufficiently different from Anglo-American cultures to suggest that the forms taken by teacher appraisal in those countries may be inappropriate for Hong Kong. In the final section, we briefly discuss a number of issues that, it is suggested, deserve consideration when Hong Kong schools design and implement teacher appraisal schemes. As we stress throughout the study, our discussion is not intended to be definitive. Rather, we hope it will stimulate discussion and research into discovering more culturally sensitive ways of appraising teachers in different parts of the world.

[1]  M. Bond Beyond the Chinese face , 1991 .

[2]  C. Dimmock,et al.  Towards comparative educational administration: building the case for a cross‐cultural school‐based approach , 1998 .

[3]  Leadership Dilemmas of Hong Kong Principals: Sources, Perceptions and Outcomes , 2000 .

[4]  Richard W. Woodman,et al.  An international comparison of organization development practices The USA and Hong Kong , 1996 .

[5]  E. Bridges,et al.  Wisdom gained, wisdom given: instituting PBL in a Chinese culture , 1996 .

[6]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The social psychology of Chinese people. , 1986 .

[7]  A. Walker,et al.  Valuing differences: Strategies for dealing with the tensions of educational leadership in a global society , 1998 .

[8]  The neglected dimension: cultural comparison in educational administration , 1995 .

[9]  C. Dimmock Restructuring Hong Kong's Schools , 1998 .

[10]  Thomas J. Sergiovanni The Principalship: A Reflective Practice Perspective , 1987 .

[11]  A. Walker,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Approach to the Study of Educational Leadership: An Emerging Framework1 , 1999 .

[12]  Clive Dimmock,et al.  Designing the Learning-centred School: A Cross-cultural Perspective , 1999 .

[13]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The handbook of Chinese psychology. , 1996 .

[14]  T. Jackson,et al.  Foreign companies and Chinese workers: employee motivation in the People’s Republic of China , 1998 .

[15]  L. Bell Managing Teams in Secondary Schools , 1992 .

[16]  R. Westwood,et al.  International strategies of corporate culture change: emulation, consumption and hybridity , 1998 .

[17]  B. L. Wilson,et al.  Successful Secondary Schools: Visions of Excellence in American Public Education , 1989 .

[18]  Challenging the boundaries of sameness: leadership through valuing difference , 1998 .

[19]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[20]  N. Adler International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior , 1986 .

[21]  Kofi Lomotey Social and Cultural Influences on Schooling: A Commentary on the UCEA Knowledge Base Project, Domain I , 1995 .

[22]  Richard Rose,et al.  Comparing Forms of Comparative Analysis , 1991 .

[23]  K. S. Yang Authoritarianism and evaluation of appropriateness of role behavior. , 1970, The Journal of social psychology.

[24]  J. Daresh The Principalship: A Reflective Practice Perspective, 2d ed , 1991 .

[25]  G. Redding The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism , 1995 .

[26]  I. Chow An Opinion Survey of Performance Appraisal Practices in Hong Kong and the People's Republic of China , 1995 .

[27]  Y. Paul Huo,et al.  On transplanting human resource practices to China , 1995 .

[28]  Brian J. Caldwell,et al.  The Self-managing School , 1988 .

[29]  J. Seddon Assumptions, Culture and Performance Appraisal , 1987 .

[30]  J. McCormick,et al.  Teacher Appraisal in Hong Kong Self-Managing Secondary Schools: Factors for Effective Practices , 1998 .

[31]  Gordon Redding,et al.  The psychology of Chinese organizational behaviour. , 1986 .

[32]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[33]  Robert I Westwood,et al.  Organisational behaviour:Southeast Asian perspectives , 1992 .

[34]  H. Innis Decentralization and Democracy , 1943 .

[35]  C. Dimmock,et al.  Comparative Educational Administration: Developing a Cross-Cultural Conceptual Framework , 1998 .

[36]  P. Herbig,et al.  Negotiating with Chinese: a cultural perspective , 1998 .

[37]  Simcha Ronen,et al.  Comparative and multinational management , 1986 .

[38]  C. Dimmock,et al.  Transforming Hong Kong’s schools: trends and emerging issues , 1998 .

[39]  F. Hsu Suppression versus repression; a limited psychological interpretation of four cultures. , 1949, Psychiatry.

[40]  Clive Dimmock Hong Kong's School Reform: Importing Western Policy Into an Asian Culture , 2000 .

[41]  K. Leithwood,et al.  Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know , 1996 .

[42]  G. Hofstede Cultural constraints in management theories , 1993 .

[43]  C. Dimmock,et al.  Hong Kong's Change of Sovereignty: School Leader Perceptions of the Effects on Educational Policy and School Administration. , 1997 .

[44]  C. Dimmock,et al.  School Restructuring in Hong Kong: The Perceptions of Middle Managers , 1999 .

[45]  Allan Walker,et al.  Future school administration : Western and Asian perspectives , 2000 .

[46]  C. Dimmock,et al.  Hong Kong's return to mainland China: Education policy in times of uncertainty , 1998 .

[47]  M. Fullan Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series: 10. , 1993 .

[48]  A. Mamman,et al.  Short‐termism, control, quick‐fix and bottom line: Toward explaining the Western approach to management , 1998 .

[49]  F. Sharpe Towards a research paradigm on devolution , 1996 .

[50]  C. Dimmock,et al.  Exploring Principals’ Dilemmas in Hong Kong: Increasing Cross-Cultural Understanding of School Leadership , 1999 .