Moving Across Paradigms between the Process Design and Enactment Phase in Enterprise Information Systems

While the business process management literature often assumes a single approach (e.g. procedural or eventdriven) over the process lifecycle, a transition between approaches at different phases in the process lifecycle may significantly reduce the impact of intrinsic trade-offs between process characteristics. This position paper explores several business process strategies by analyzing the approaches at different phases in the process lifecycle as well as the various transitions.

[1]  Gerti Kappel,et al.  Coordination in Workflow Management Systems - A Rule-Based Approach , 1996, Coordination Technology for Collaborative Applications.

[2]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  DecSerFlow: Towards a Truly Declarative Service Flow Language , 2006, WS-FM.

[3]  Stephen Fickas Design issues in a Rule-Based System , 1985, SLIPE '85.

[4]  M Maja Pesic,et al.  Constraint-based workflow management systems : shifting control to users , 2008 .

[5]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Declarative workflows: Balancing between flexibility and support , 2009, Computer Science - Research and Development.

[6]  Jan Mendling,et al.  From business process models to process-oriented software systems , 2009, TSEM.

[7]  Diogo R. Ferreira,et al.  Learning, planning, and the life cycle of workflow management , 2005, Ninth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC'05).

[8]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Process Flexibility: A Survey of Contemporary Approaches , 2008, CIAO! / EOMAS.

[9]  Fabio Casati,et al.  Deriving Active Rules for Workflow Enactment , 1996, DEXA.

[10]  Jian Yu,et al.  Pattern Based Property Specification and Verification for Service Composition , 2006, WISE.

[11]  Julien Vayssière,et al.  Event-Based Coordination of Process-Oriented Composite Applications , 2005, Business Process Management.

[12]  Rainer Schmidt Flexibility in Service Processes , 2006, BPMDS.

[13]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures , 2007 .

[14]  Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al.  On managing business processes variants , 2009, Data Knowl. Eng..

[15]  James A. Hendler,et al.  AI Planning: Systems and Techniques , 1990, AI Mag..

[16]  Patricia Malone,et al.  Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done , 2011 .

[17]  Maria E. Orlowska,et al.  Specification and validation of process constraints for flexible workflows , 2005, Inf. Syst..

[18]  Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al.  A Survey of Comparative Business Process Modeling Approaches , 2007, BIS.

[19]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Capturing variability in business process models: the Provop approach , 2010, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[20]  Jan Mendling,et al.  On the Translation between BPMN and BPEL , 2006, EMMSAD.

[21]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Declarative versus Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Understandability , 2009, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[22]  Michael D. Zisman,et al.  Representation, specification and automation of office procedures , 1977 .

[23]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  A Declarative Approach for Flexible Business Processes Management , 2006, Business Process Management Workshops.

[24]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems , 2009, Trans. Petri Nets Other Model. Concurr..

[25]  Liangzhao Zeng,et al.  PLM flow-Dynamic Business Process Composition and Execution by Rule Inference , 2002, TES.

[26]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Declarative versus Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Maintainability , 2009, Business Process Management Workshops.

[27]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Modeling and Enactment of Workflow Systems , 1993, Application and Theory of Petri Nets.

[28]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  Process Materialization Using Templates and Rules to Design Flexible Process Models , 2009, RuleML.

[29]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Beyond rigidity – dynamic process lifecycle support , 2009, Computer Science - Research and Development.

[30]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[31]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Flexibility as a Service , 2009, DASFAA Workshops.

[32]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Transforming BPMN Diagrams into YAWL Nets , 2008, BPM.

[33]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Business Process and Business Rule Modeling: A Representational Analysis , 2007, 2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop.