Magnetic resonance planimetry of the vena contracta as a new approach to assessment of stenotic heart valves: An in vitro study

Exact determination of the orifice area in stenotic valve disease is essential to guide therapy. With the standard imaging methods, the orifice area has to be calculated by empirically‐derived formulas, which may be susceptible to changes in hemodynamic status, leading to wrong therapeutic decisions. We tested the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify the orifice area by planimetry of the proximal vena contracta (PVC) in an idealized, constant‐flow model in a 1.0‐T tomograph (Siemens Magnetom Expert). There was a close correlation of the PVC area in MRI and the true orifice area (r2 = 0.985), and agreement of the methods as measured by the Bland‐Altman test was significant with a low systematic error of –0.02 cm2. We conclude that MRI planimetry of the PVC in stenotic valves in a constant‐flow model may be used to reliably measure the orifice area. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;14:31–34. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  E. Gill,et al.  Utility of three-dimensional ultrasound Doppler flow reconstruction of the proximal jet to quantify effective orifice area: in vitro steady and pulsatile flow studies. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Spontaneous Variability of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Gradient in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy , 1998, Circulation.

[3]  M. Degertekin,et al.  Validation of flow convergence region method in assessing mitral valve area in the course of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic studies. , 1998, American heart journal.

[4]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Comparison of vena contracta width by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography with quantitative Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  D. C. Miller,et al.  Continuing dilemmas concerning aortic valve replacement in patients with advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction. , 1997, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[6]  B. Carabello,et al.  Timing of valve replacement in aortic stenosis. Moving closer to perfection. , 1997, Circulation.

[7]  S. Holmer,et al.  Transgastric Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the severity of aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  R. Petitclerc,et al.  Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R. Falk,et al.  Optimal number of beats for the Doppler measurement of cardiac output in atrial fibrillation. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  T. Carpenter,et al.  Measurement of pulsatile flow using MRI and a Bayesian technique of probability analysis. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  J. Thomas,et al.  Multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of mitral valve disease. , 1995, American journal of cardiac imaging.

[12]  Y. Higashida,et al.  Quantitative measurement of high flow velocities by a spin echo MR technique. , 1991, Radiation medicine.

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[14]  W. Likoff,et al.  Valvular Heart Disease , 2018, The Perioperative Medicine Consult Handbook.

[15]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[16]  R GORLIN,et al.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. , 1951, American heart journal.