BIS Monitoring to Prevent Awareness during General Anesthesia

Background Unexpected awareness is a rare but well-described complication of general anesthesia that has received increased scientific and media attention in the past few years. Transformed electroencephalogram monitors, such as the Bispectral Index monitor, have been advocated as tools to prevent unexpected recall. Methods The authors conducted a power analysis to estimate how many patients would be needed in an appropriately powered study to demonstrate the Bispectral Index monitor reduces awareness, as well as a cost analysis to assess the cost of using the monitor for this purpose alone. Results If unexpected recall is rare (1 in 20,000), it will require a large study to demonstrate that the monitor reduces awareness (200,000–800,000 patients), and the cost of using it for this purpose alone would be high ($400,000 per case prevented). If awareness is common (1 in 100), then the number of patients needed in a study to demonstrate that the monitor works becomes tractable (1,000–4,000 patients), and the cost of using the monitor for this purpose alone becomes lower ($2,000 per case prevented). Because there are reported cases of awareness despite Bispectral Index monitoring, the authors are certain that the effectiveness of the monitor is less than 100%. As the performance of the monitor decreases from 100%, the size of the study needed to demonstrate that it works increases, as does the cost of using it to prevent awareness. Conclusion The contention that Bispectral Index monitoring reduces the risk of awareness is unproven, and the cost of using it for this indication is currently unknown.

[1]  A. Yli-Hankala,et al.  EEG bispectral index monitoring in sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia: analysis of direct costs and immediate recovery , 1999, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  P Manberg,et al.  Bispectral Analysis Measures Sedation and Memory Effects of Propofol, Midazolam, Isoflurane, and Alfentanil in Healthy Volunteers , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[3]  J. A. Boyle,et al.  MEDICAL EMIGRATION AND RECRUITMENT. , 1964, Lancet.

[4]  P. Sebel,et al.  Central nervous system monitoring during open heart surgery: an update. , 1998, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[5]  J. Perrott The Fate of the Foreskin , 1950 .

[6]  Scott M. Smith THE USE OF CURARE IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN , 1947 .

[7]  P. Choban,et al.  Preoperative intensive care unit admission and hemodynamic monitoring in patients scheduled for major elective noncardiac surgery: a retrospective review of 95 patients. , 1998, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[8]  K L Posner,et al.  Awareness during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[9]  Peter S. Sebel,et al.  Bispectral Index Monitoring Allows Faster Emergence and Improved Recovery from Propofol, Alfentanil, and Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia , 1997 .

[10]  P. White,et al.  THE BISPECTRAL (BIS) INDEX PREDICTS FAST-TRACK ELIGIBILITY AFTER AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA , 1998 .

[11]  Jin Liu,et al.  Electroencephalographic Bispectral Index Correlates with Intraoperative Recall and Depth of Propofol-Induced Sedation , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  L. Goodman,et al.  THE LACK OF CEREBRAL EFFECTS OF d-TOBOCURARINE , 1947, Anesthesiology.

[13]  C. Turner Clinical observations on the use of curare in anesthesia. , 1950, The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists.

[14]  G. Organe,et al.  Tubocurarine chloride as an adjunct to anaesthesia; report on 180 cases. , 1946, The Lancet.

[15]  J G Jones,et al.  Perception and memory during general anaesthesia. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.