Evaluation of Continuous Tumor-Size–Based End Points as Surrogates for Overall Survival in Randomized Clinical Trials in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Key Points Question Can end points based on the kinetics of tumor size after treatment be used as surrogates for overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer? Findings In this pooled analysis of data from 20 randomized clinical trials, time to nadir and depth of nadir were modeled and assessed as potential surrogates for overall survival at the patient and trial levels. The associations found were weak or moderate; there were notable differences in tumor-size kinetics between antiangiogenic agents and anti–epidermal growth factor receptor agents. Meaning The implications of these results for early drug development and clinical practice are unclear and warrant further studies; the findings of this study reinforce the need to develop more reliable end points that reflect tumor biology and patient benefit.

[1]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study , 2023, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  L. Collette,et al.  A Systematic Review and Recommendation for Reporting of Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation Using Meta-analyses , 2019, JNCI cancer spectrum.

[4]  U. Mansmann,et al.  Early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[5]  S. Barni,et al.  Early tumour shrinkage as a prognostic factor and surrogate end-point in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and pooled-analysis. , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[6]  L. Boni,et al.  Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III TRIBE trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  M. Buyse,et al.  Use of early tumor shrinkage to predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Nenad Sarapa,et al.  Evaluation of tumor-size response metrics to predict overall survival in Western and Chinese patients with first-line metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  R. Salazar,et al.  Cediranib with mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab with mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomized phase III study (HORIZON III). , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Cediranib plus FOLFOX/CAPOX versus placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, phase III study (HORIZON II). , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M Mauer,et al.  Adaptive designs at European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) with a focus on adaptive sample size re-estimation based on interim-effect size. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[12]  A. Graser,et al.  Improved early prediction of individual prognosis for patients with mCRC: Joint modeling of tumor shrinkage with volume data for PFS and OS. , 2012 .

[13]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[14]  M. Parmar,et al.  Chemotherapy options in elderly and frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS2): an open-label, randomised factorial trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[15]  Josep Tabernero,et al.  Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  M. Stockler,et al.  Capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX Study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Linda Mol,et al.  Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  D. Sargent,et al.  Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials , 2009, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Seta Shahin,et al.  A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Marissa N Lassere,et al.  The Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema: a review of the biomarker-surrogate literature and a proposal for a criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema for evaluating the status of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints , 2008, Statistical methods in medical research.

[23]  M. Buyse,et al.  Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Junichi Sakamoto,et al.  Exploring and validating surrogate endpoints in colorectal cancer , 2008, Lifetime data analysis.

[25]  D. Sargent,et al.  Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC-C Study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  A. Carrato,et al.  Phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with continuous-infusion fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: final report of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors Trial. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Richard J Stephens,et al.  Different strategies of sequential and combination chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS): a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[29]  Linda Mol,et al.  Sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (CAIRO): a phase III randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[30]  L. Crinò,et al.  Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  J. Hecht,et al.  Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  C. Tournigand,et al.  FOLFIRI Followed by FOLFOX6 or the Reverse Sequence in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized GERCOR Study , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  M. Buyse,et al.  Overall survival is not a realistic end point for clinical trials of new drugs in advanced solid tumors: a critical assessment based on recently reported phase III trials in colorectal and breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Validation of a longitudinally measured surrogate marker for a time-to-event endpoint , 2003 .

[36]  D. DeMets,et al.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[37]  R Henderson,et al.  Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and event time data. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[38]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis , 2000, The Lancet.

[39]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[40]  J. Thigpen Chemotherapy options in elderly and frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS2): an open-label, randomised factorial trial , 2011 .

[41]  E. Chiorean Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial , 2011 .

[42]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[43]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Validation of surrogate end points in multiple randomized clinical trials with failure time end points , 2001 .