The association between public health engagement in school-based substance use prevention programs and student alcohol, cannabis, e-cigarette and cigarette use

Objective This study examined the associations between public health engagement (PHE) in school-based substance use prevention programs and student substance use. For the purposes of this study, PHE refers to any form of collaboration between the local government public health agency and the school to promote the physical and mental health of students. Methods Data for this study were collected from the Cannabis, Obesity, Mental health, Physical activity, Alcohol use, Smoking and Sedentary behaviour (COMPASS) study during the 2018/2019 data collection year. Multilevel logistic regression was used to analyze the associations between PHE and student substance use. Results Data from 84 schools and 42,149 students were included; 70% of schools had PHE in substance use prevention programs. PHE in substance use prevention appears to have had no significant impact on student substance use in our models. When PHE was divided into five methods of engagement, it was found that when public health solved problems jointly with schools, the odds of a student using alcohol or cannabis significantly increased. When schools were split into low- and high-use schools for each substance measured, some methods of PHE significantly decreased the odds of cannabis and cigarette use in high-use schools and significantly increased the odds of alcohol and cannabis use in low-use schools. Conclusion This study highlights the need to develop better partnerships and collaborations between public health and schools, and the importance of ensuring that school-based substance use prevention programs are evidence-based and tailored to the specific needs of schools and students. Objectif L’étude porte sur les associations entre la participation de la santé publique (PSP) aux programmes de prévention de l’usage de substances en milieu scolaire et l’usage de substances par les élèves. Pour les besoins de l’étude, la PSP désigne toute forme de collaboration entre un organisme de santé publique local et une école visant à promouvoir la santé physique et mentale des élèves. Méthode Nos données sont tirées de l’étude COMPASS (étude de cohorte sur l’obésité, la consommation de marijuana, l’activité physique, la consommation d’alcool, le tabagisme et le comportement sédentaire) durant l’année de collecte de données 2018-2019. Les associations entre la PSP et l’usage de substances par les élèves ont été analysées au moyen de régressions logistiques multiniveaux. Résultats Nous avons inclus les données de 84 écoles et de 42 149 élèves; dans 70 % des écoles, la santé publique participait aux programmes de prévention de l’usage de substances. La PSP à la prévention de l’usage de substances semble n’avoir eu aucun effet significatif sur l’usage de substances par les élèves dans nos modèles. Quand nous avons divisé la PSP en cinq méthodes de participation, nous avons constaté que lorsque la santé publique résolvait les problèmes conjointement avec les écoles, la probabilité qu’une ou un élève consomme de l’alcool ou du cannabis augmentait de façon significative. Quand nous avons divisé les écoles en écoles à faible et à forte consommation pour chaque substance mesurée, certaines méthodes de PSP réduisaient de façon significative les probabilités d’usage de cannabis et de cigarettes dans les écoles à forte consommation et faisaient augmenter de façon significative les probabilités d’usage d’alcool et de cannabis dans les écoles à faible consommation. Conclusion Notre étude fait ressortir le besoin de créer de meilleurs partenariats et collaborations entre la santé publique et les écoles, ainsi que l’importance de s’assurer que les programmes de prévention de l’usage de substances en milieu scolaire reposent sur des données probantes et qu’ils sont adaptés aux besoins particuliers des écoles et des élèves.

[1]  F. Leslie Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain , 2020, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[2]  Christopher P. Salas-Wright,et al.  Trends in Substance Use Prevention Program Participation Among Adolescents in the U.S. , 2019, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[3]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys , 2019, BMJ.

[4]  Virág Márk Cikkismertetés: Globális helyzetjelentés az alkoholról és egészségről 2018 [Article review: Global status report on alcohol and health 2018] , 2019 .

[5]  S. Leatherdale,et al.  Prelegalisation patterns and trends of cannabis use among Canadian youth: results from the COMPASS prospective cohort study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[6]  C. Chapman,et al.  Empowering young people to make Positive Choices: Evidence-based resources for the prevention of alcohol and other drug use in Australian schools , 2017 .

[7]  F. Smit,et al.  School-based programmes to reduce and prevent substance use in different age groups: What works for whom? Systematic review and meta-regression analysis. , 2016, Clinical psychology review.

[8]  S. Kumra,et al.  Adverse Effects of Cannabis on Adolescent Brain Development: A Longitudinal Study , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Hickman Matthew,et al.  Peer‐led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2016, Addiction.

[10]  M. Yücel,et al.  Cannabis and adolescent brain development. , 2015, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[11]  R. Perera,et al.  Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, BMJ Open.

[12]  F. Faggiano,et al.  Universal school-based prevention for illicit drug use. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  S. Leatherdale,et al.  The COMPASS study: a longitudinal hierarchical research platform for evaluating natural experiments related to changes in school-level programs, policies and built environment resources , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[14]  R. Perera,et al.  School-based programmes for preventing smoking. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  L. Johnston,et al.  Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Use Prevention Programs in U.S. Schools: A Descriptive Summary , 2013, Prevention Science.

[16]  S. Leatherdale,et al.  Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status. , 2012, Health reports.

[17]  I. Sigfusdottir,et al.  Substance use prevention through school and community-based health promotion: a transdisciplinary approach from Iceland , 2011, Global health promotion.

[18]  A. Fletcher,et al.  "We don't have no drugs education": The myth of universal drugs education in English secondary schools? , 2010, The International journal on drug policy.

[19]  M. Polacsek,et al.  Impact of a school health coordinator intervention on health-related school policies and student behavior. , 2010, The Journal of school health.

[20]  S. Ennett,et al.  The Prevalence of Effective Substance Use Prevention Curricula in the Nation’s High Schools , 2008, The Journal of Primary Prevention.

[21]  Garrett M. Fitzmaurice,et al.  A Primer in Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2008, Circulation.

[22]  A. Madore The Canada Health Act. , 2000, RNAO news.

[23]  Christopher P. Salas-Wright,et al.  Trends in Substance Use Prevention Program Participation among Adolescents in the United States , 2019 .

[24]  P. Biemer,et al.  Repeated measures estimation of measurement bias for self-reported drug use with applications to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. , 1997, NIDA research monograph.

[25]  Global status report on alcohol and health , 2022 .