High technology localization and extra-regional networks

Firms in spatial concentrations of advanced-technology activities do not constrain their knowledge inputs to opportunities found within their industrial cluster. Rather, firms seeking extra-regional markets augment their in-house resources by means of material (embodied technology) and knowledge inputs obtained from sources at the extra-regional scale in addition to within the region. Literature is reviewed on the clustering of firms and their network geography, models of open and closed industrial systems, and absorptive capacity. The latter is used to interpret the search for knowledge undertaken by firms, which are discussed in terms of their organizational differences and strategic choices. A sample of manufacturing establishments from the electronics cluster in the Toronto metropolitan region (Canada) shows firms that are export-intensive have significantly stronger international input connections, especially with consultants and alliance partners. Export orientation is associated with higher levels of expenditure on the in-house generation of knowledge, more innovation inputs from external sources, and distinctive network geographies. Differences in network relations occur within and between three organizational groups of firms – foreign affiliates, multi-location and single-location domestic firms. Geographically wide-ranging networks are interpreted in terms of opportunities in extra-regional locations compared with local supplies. Regional innovation policy implications are considered.

[1]  James Simmie,et al.  Innovation projects and local production networks: A case study of Hertfordshire , 1999 .

[2]  New Product Development Among Small Toronto Manufacturers: Empirical Evidence on the Role of Technical Service Linkages , 1988 .

[3]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  Innovation Systems in a Global Economy , 1999 .

[4]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[5]  Luis Suarez-Villa,et al.  Operational Strategy, R&D and Intra-metropolitan Clustering in a Polycentric Structure: The Advanced Electronics Industries of the Los Angeles Basin , 1997 .

[6]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy , 1999 .

[7]  R. Ahern.  The Role of Strategic Alliances in the International Organization of Industry , 1993 .

[8]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[9]  M. Meeus,et al.  Firm clustering and innovation : determinants and effects , 2001 .

[10]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Introduction: Origins of the Concept , 1998 .

[11]  C. Prahalad.  The Role of Core Competencies in the Corporation , 1993 .

[12]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  No place like home? The embeddedness of innovation in a regional economy , 2000 .

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[14]  Claire Nauwelaers,et al.  Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential , 1995, Scientometrics.

[15]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered , 2001 .

[16]  James Simmie,et al.  Reasons for the Development of 'Islands of Innovation': Evidence from Hertfordshire , 1998 .

[17]  J. H. Britton.  Regional Implications of North American Integration: A Canadian Perspective on High Technology Manufacturing , 2002 .

[18]  M. Freel,et al.  External linkages and product innovation in small manufacturing firms , 2000 .

[19]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[20]  M. Fischer.  The Innovation Process and Network Activities of Manufacturing Firms , 1998 .

[21]  J. Howells.  Regional Systems of Innovation , 1999 .

[22]  M. Porter.  Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy , 2000 .

[23]  武石 彰.  Bridging inter-and intra-firm boundaries : management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 1998 .

[24]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  The Role of Large Producers in Industrial Districts: A Case Study of High Technology Systems Houses in Southern California , 1992 .

[25]  Barry Moore,et al.  Internationalisation Processes, Networking and Local Embeddedness in Technology-Intensive Small Firms , 1998 .

[26]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[27]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered , 2001 .

[28]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Towards a Knowledge‐based Theory of the Geographical Cluster , 2001 .

[29]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  On the Relationship Between Firm Size and Export Intensity , 1992 .

[30]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[32]  David A. Wolfe,et al.  The Dynamics of Regional Innovation in Ontario , 1998 .

[33]  D. Lecraw.  Alliance Capitalism and Global Business , 1997 .

[34]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[35]  A. Macpherson,et al.  The contribution of external service inputs to the product development efforts of small manufacturing firms , 1997 .

[36]  S. Cornish,et al.  Product Innovation and the Spatial Dynamics of Market Intelligence: Does Proximity to Markets Matter? , 1997 .

[37]  M. Best.  The New Competitive Advantage , 2001 .

[38]  J. Holbrook,et al.  Firm-level analysis of determinants of Canadian industrial R&D performance , 1996 .

[39]  M. Anderson.  The Role of Collaborative Integration in Industrial Organization: Observations from the Canadian Aerospace Industry , 1995 .

[40]  J. Howells.  Research and Technology Outsourcing , 1999 .

[41]  R. Florida.  Toward the Learning Region , 1995 .

[42]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[43]  E. Malecki,et al.  Network Activities, Information and Competitiveness in Small Firms , 1993 .

[44]  K. Morgan.  The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[45]  J. H. Britton,et al.  Network Structure of an Industrial Cluster: Electronics in Toronto , 2003 .

[46]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[47]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[48]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Innovation, networks and localities , 1999 .

[49]  Boris Braun,et al.  Territorial or Trans-territorial Networking: Spatial Aspects of Technology-oriented Cooperation within the German Mechanical Engineering Industry , 1997 .

[50]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[51]  P. McCann,et al.  Industrial alliances and firm location behaviour: some evidence from the US semiconductor industry , 2000 .

[52]  Harald Bathelt,et al.  Regional competence and economic recovery: divergent growth paths in Boston's high technology economy , 2001 .

[53]  Vivien Walsh,et al.  Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm , 1996 .

[54]  C. Karlsson,et al.  The Development of Sweden's R&D-Intensive Electronics Industries: Exports, Outsourcing, and Territorial Distribution , 1996 .

[55]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe , 1989 .

[56]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[57]  M. Gibbons.  Technology and Economy: A Review of Some Critical Relationships , 1995 .

[58]  Barry Moore,et al.  Collective Learning Processes, Networking and 'Institutional Thickness' in the Cambridge Region , 1999 .

[59]  Anders Malmberg,et al.  Innovations, Competitiveness and Local Embeddedness: A Study of Machinery Producers in Sweden , 1999 .

[60]  A. Macpherson.  Industrial Innovation in the Small Business Sector: Empirical Evidence from Metropolitan Toronto , 1988 .

[61]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[62]  P. Oinas.  Activity-specificity in organizational learning: implications for analysing the role of proximity , 1999 .

[63]  R. Grotz.  Networks, milieu and industrial firm strategies: empirical evidence of an innovative SME environment. , 1993 .

[64]  B. Harrison,et al.  Innovative Firm Behavior and Local Milieu: Exploring the Intersection of Agglomeration, Firm Effects, and Technological Change , 1996 .

[65]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .