Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape

Abstract Many years of research at the Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil, and Water Research have resulted in a set of attributes that determine landscape perception and evaluation in The Netherlands. Investigations were carried out among the inhabitants of different regions. Despite great physical differences between the regions there was much agreement on the salient attributes. These are: the nature of the landscape as a whole (unity), its function (use), maintenance, naturalness, spaciousness, development in time, soil and water, and sensory qualities such as colour and smell. They may be considered basic qualities of the Dutch landscape. Unity and use always come first; they determine the significance of the other attributes. The attributes may be used in planning procedures, such as developing Environmental Impact Assessments, designing new landscapes, or even constructing a map of people's evaluation of the landscape.

[1]  Seymour Wapner,et al.  Experiencing the environment , 1976 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  The Organization of Complex Systems , 1977 .

[3]  R. Ulrich.  Human responses to vegetation and landscapes , 1986 .

[4]  J. F. Coeterier.  Non-agricultural use of the countryside in the Netherlands: what is local opinion? , 1994 .

[5]  David Pitt,et al.  Perceptions and Measurements of Scenic Resources in the Southern Connecticut River Valley , 1974 .

[6]  A. T. Purcell,et al.  Abstract and specific physical attributes and the experience of landscape , 1992 .

[7]  R. H. Arnot,et al.  The application of a method for terrain analysis to functional land-capability assessment and aesthetic landscape appreciation , 1981 .

[8]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  The psychological representation of molar physical environments , 1981 .

[9]  J. F. Coeterier.  Cues for the Perception of the Size of Space in Landscapes , 1994 .

[10]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Models of Discovery , 1978 .

[11]  J. Wohlwill,et al.  Dimensionalizing the Environmental Manifold , 1976 .

[12]  A. T. Purcell,et al.  Environmental Perception and Affect , 1986 .

[13]  A. Schutz.  Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality , 1972 .

[14]  A. B. Blankenship,et al.  Say it with Figures. , 1947 .

[15]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  The Timeless Way of Building , 1979 .

[16]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced , 1985 .

[17]  F. Gonzales-Bernaldez,et al.  Environmental preferences in outdoor recreation areas in Madrid (Spain). , 1981 .

[18]  Ervin H. Zube,et al.  Landscape perception: Research, application and theory , 1982 .

[19]  K. Lynch.  What time is this place , 1972 .

[20]  D. W. Meinig,et al.  The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes , 1979 .

[21]  J. F. Coeterier.  A photo validity test , 1983 .

[22]  James A. Russell,et al.  Adaptation level and the affective appraisal of environments , 1984 .

[23]  Peter Weichhart,et al.  Assessment of the natural environment—A determinant of residential preferences? , 1983 .

[24]  Ervin H. Zube,et al.  Perceiving Environmental Quality , 1976 .

[25]  Robert L. Thayer,et al.  Implied human influence reduces landscape beauty , 1980 .

[26]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[27]  U. Neisser.  Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[28]  D. Lowenthal,et al.  The Past is a Foreign Country , 1986 .

[29]  A. Angyal.  Foundations for a science of personality , 1943 .

[30]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The psychology of Egon Brunswik , 1966 .

[31]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Preference and the visual environment: Complexity and some alternatives , 1972 .

[32]  A Koestler,et al.  Ghost in the Machine , 1970 .

[33]  Seasonality bias in landscape preference research , 1979 .

[34]  Joan Nassauer.  Managing for naturalness in wildland and agricultural landscapes , 1979 .

[35]  A. Purcell,et al.  Landscape Perception, Preference, and Schema Discrepancy , 1987 .

[36]  F. Herzberg.  Work and the nature of man , 1967 .

[37]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behavior Research , 1981 .

[38]  Joan Iverson Nassauer.  A non‐linear model of visual quality , 1980 .

[39]  Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell,et al.  A public preference evaluation of landscape quality , 1982 .

[40]  Atsuyuki Okabe,et al.  Distance and Direction Judgment in a Large-Scale Natural Environment , 1986 .

[41]  H. Dijkstra,et al.  Research on the visual perception and appreciation of, and visual changes in a hedgerow landscape , 1976 .