Imaging of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background: Carotid plaque neovascularization (vasa vasorum [VV]) may be useful for detecting high-risk atherosclerotic plaques. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) are 2 commonly used techniques for imaging VV of the carotid plaque, yet the relationship between their measurements remains unknown. Objectives: We aimed to blindly evaluate the correlation between CEUS and DCE-MRI in measuring carotid plaque VV. Methods: We recruited subjects with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (≥50%). VV was graded by CEUS, based on richness of contrast signal, according to 3 different methods named CEUS_A, CEUS_B and CEUS_C on different point scales (the higher the values, the higher the estimated VV). A 3.0 T MRI scanner was used for VV quantification by DCE-MRI using gadolinium contrast kinetic modelling for computing the fractional plasma volume (vp) and transfer constant (Ktrans). Results: The analysis included 30 patients. A significant correlation between CEUS and DCE-MRI findings was observed when CEUS_C was used for neovessel grading and DCE-MRI was used to determine adventitial (r = 0.460, p = 0.010) and plaque (r = 0.374, p = 0.042) Ktrans values. CEUS_B (r = 0.416, p = 0.022) and CEUS_C (r = 0.443, p = 0.014) grading showed a significant correlation with regard to the maximal Ktrans. Conclusions: We found a positive but weak correlation and a moderate diagnostic agreement between neovessels as visually graded by CEUS and adventitial neovessels assessed by DCE-MRI Ktrans in carotid atherosclerosis. These findings may help in understanding how VV density, flow, and permeability influence in vivo measurements by CEUS and DCE-MRI as well as in selecting the most appropriate variables and imaging method in future research and potentially in clinical settings. Further confirmative studies are necessary to confirm our results.

[1]  M. E. Kooi,et al.  Carotid Artery Wall Imaging: Perspective and Guidelines from the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  C. Yuan,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid vasa vasorum in relation to coronary and cerebrovascular events. , 2017, Atherosclerosis.

[3]  D. Staub,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization and its correlation to plaque echogenicity in human carotid arteries atherosclerosis. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  Data on consistency among different methods to assess atherosclerotic plaque echogenicity on standard ultrasound and intraplaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in human carotid artery , 2016, Data in brief.

[5]  W. Kerwin,et al.  Scan-rescan reproducibility of quantitative assessment of inflammatory carotid atherosclerotic plaque using dynamic contrast-enhanced 3T CMR in a multi-center study , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[6]  W. Kerwin,et al.  Adventitial Perfusion and Intraplaque Hemorrhage: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Study in the Carotid Artery , 2013, Stroke.

[7]  E. Sijbrands,et al.  Current status and future developments of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of carotid atherosclerosis. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  P. Libby,et al.  "In vivo" imaging of atherosclerosis. , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[9]  B. Astor,et al.  Carotid Plaque Neovascularization and Hemorrhage Detected by MR Imaging are Associated with Recent Cerebrovascular Ischemic Events , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[10]  E. Eriksson Intravital Microscopy on Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E–Deficient Mice Establishes Microvessels as Major Entry Pathways for Leukocytes to Advanced Lesions , 2011, Circulation.

[11]  Valentin Fuster,et al.  Imaging of atherosclerosis: magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, European heart journal.

[12]  Linda Lavery,et al.  Quantification of plaque neovascularization using contrast ultrasound: a histologic validation. , 2011, European heart journal.

[13]  Sasan Partovi,et al.  Correlation of carotid artery atherosclerotic lesion echogenicity and severity at standard US with intraplaque neovascularization detected at contrast-enhanced US. , 2011, Radiology.

[14]  A. Davies,et al.  The use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in carotid arterial disease. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[15]  D. Adam,et al.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[16]  Steven B. Feinstein,et al.  Vasa Vasorum and Plaque Neovascularization on Contrast-Enhanced Carotid Ultrasound Imaging Correlates With Cardiovascular Disease and Past Cardiovascular Events , 2010, Stroke.

[17]  Youbin Deng,et al.  Correlation of carotid plaque neovascularization detected by using contrast-enhanced US with clinical symptoms. , 2009, Radiology.

[18]  Roberto Chiesa,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  W S Kerwin,et al.  MR imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Steven B. Feinstein,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis? , 2007, Vascular medicine.

[21]  Fei Liu,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Carotid Atherosclerosis: Plaque Analysis , 2007, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[22]  Natal A W van Riel,et al.  On the identifiability of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  N. Caplice,et al.  Plaque neovascularization and antiangiogenic therapy for atherosclerosis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study. , 2006, Radiology.

[25]  Gieri Cathomas,et al.  Arterial Neovascularization and Inflammation in Vulnerable Patients: Early and Late Signs of Symptomatic Atherosclerosis , 2004, Circulation.

[26]  Juan J. Badimon,et al.  Plaque Neovascularization Is Increased in Ruptured Atherosclerotic Lesions of Human Aorta: Implications for Plaque Vulnerability , 2004, Circulation.

[27]  J. Gillard Imaging of carotid artery disease: from luminology to function? , 2003 .

[28]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Neovasculature Volume in Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2003, Circulation.

[29]  S. Weiss,et al.  Matrix Metalloproteinases Regulate Neovascularization by Acting as Pericellular Fibrinolysins , 1998, Cell.