Defining perceived quality in the automotive industry: an engineering approach.

Perceived quality is the one of most important factors underlying success of car manufacturers today. There is a sufficient body of literature regarding the perceived quality from a marketing research perspective, applied psychology and consumer research. As the engineering viewpoint, perceived quality represented in the literature mainly by the work that has purpose to assess different aspects of perceived quality in order to evaluate them in the early design stages. At that point there is no theoretical framework built up yet, that combine customer view on perceived quality and the engineering prospects of this broad term. As the consequence, terms regarding perceived quality components and elements often have multiply meanings or meanings similar to each other. There is a need to standardize the terminology and definitions related to perceived quality more concretely. This paper makes the basis of the theoretical framework in an attempt to build a model, including different aspects of perceived quality regarding automotive industry needs. Based on the literature review and industry examples, the authors propose a common terminology and perceived quality definition in the field of the automotive industry.

[1]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  VISUAL SENSITIVITY: COMMUNICATING POOR QUALITY , 2006 .

[2]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Perception of gap and flush in virtual environments , 2007 .

[3]  P. N. Golder,et al.  How Does Objective Quality Affect Perceived Quality? Short-Term Effects, Long-Term Effects, and Asymmetries , 2006 .

[4]  Klaus-Peter Wiedmann,et al.  Drivers and Outcomes of Brand Heritage: Consumers' Perception of Heritage Brands in the Automotive Industry , 2011 .

[5]  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan,et al.  Towards development of a methodology to measure perception of quality of interior materials , 2005 .

[6]  Mark A. Williams,et al.  Final vehicle product audit methodologies within the automotive industry , 2007 .

[7]  WuWann Yih,et al.  Applying conjoint analysis to evaluate consumer preferences toward subcompact cars , 2014 .

[8]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[9]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Product quality: An important strategic weapon , 1984 .

[10]  Stephen Evans,et al.  Understanding luxury in the premium automotive industry , 2007, DPPI.

[11]  Kristin Paetzold,et al.  GAP AND FLUSH VISUALIZATION OF VIRTUAL NONIDEAL PROTOTYPES , 2008 .

[12]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Optical quality as a product attribute - a descriptive study from the automotive industry , 2008 .

[13]  Casper Wickman,et al.  A Framework for Non-nominal Visualization and Perceived Quality Evaluation , 2011 .

[14]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Brand Relationship Spectrum , 2000 .

[15]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  The Effects of Geometrical Variation on Perceived Quality - A Close Look at the Concept of Visual Robustness , 2009 .

[16]  H. Lieb,et al.  Perceived quality as a key factor for strategic change in product development , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[17]  Casper Wickman.  Visualising the Effect of Geometrical Variation in Assembled Products. Predicting Visual Quality Appearance , 2005 .

[18]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Defining Quality Appearance Index Weights by Combining VR and CAT Technologies , 2001 .

[19]  片岡 篤,et al.  乗用車開発における Perceived Quality 評価 , 2008 .

[20]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[21]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  A Study of Customers' and the Automotive Industry's Attitude Regarding Visual Quality Appearance of Split-Lines , 2004 .

[22]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Modelling perceptions of craftsmanship in vehicle interior design , 2011 .

[23]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  Visually decomposing vehicle images: Exploring the influence of different aesthetic features on consumer perception of brand , 2012 .

[24]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  Applying conjoint analysis to evaluate consumer preferences toward subcompact cars , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  Peter M. Dew,et al.  Visualizing the impact of tolerances on cosmetic product quality , 2001 .

[26]  P. Homer.  Perceived quality and image: When all is not “rosy” , 2008 .

[27]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Handling subjective product properties in engineering, food and fashion , 2014 .

[28]  F Penzkofer,et al.  VISUAL ANALYSIS METHODS FOR NON-IDEAL ASSEMBLIES , 2008 .

[29]  Anders Genell.  Perception of Sound and Vibration in Heavy Trucks , 2008 .

[30]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Distribution of Customer Perception Information within the Supply Chain , 2014 .

[31]  D. K. Williams,et al.  A novel inspection method for determining the cosmetic quality of automotive skin panels , 2013 .

[32]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A cross-cultural study of users' craftsmanship perceptions in vehicle interior design , 2009 .

[33]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Corporate and Customer Understanding of Core Values Regarding Perceived Quality: Case Studies on Volvo Car Group and Volvo Group Truck Technology , 2014 .

[34]  Oliver Jung.  Factors Governing Acoustical Comfort In Vehicle Compartments , 2012 .

[35]  Faye S. McIntyre,et al.  Consumers Quality Evaluation Process , 2011 .

[36]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Squeak & Rattle simulation at Volvo Car Corporation using the E-LINE™ method , 2013 .

[37]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development , 1995 .

[38]  Anders Sköld.  Integrative Analyses of Perception and Reaction to Information and Warning Sounds in Vehicles , 2008 .

[39]  Peter M. Dew,et al.  A Virtual Environment for Aesthetic Quality Assessment of Flexible Assemblies in the Automotive Design Process , 2002 .