Science and Technology in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Overview

This paper presents and analyses a series of indicators of the state of S&T in Latin America and the Caribbean. In doing so it compares LAC countries among themselves as well as with the industrialised countries in order to identify trends concerning the closing or widening of gaps in the capacity to produce and utilise knowledge. The findings suggest that some LAC countries have created significant capacity in research but they have not been able to build virtuous links among the various relevant social actors involved in knowledge production and use. There are problems at both the supply and demand sides. Concerning the former, universities and public research institutes, which together perform almost 70% of R&D, have not created mechanisms to identify user needs and instead base their research agenda on scientific criteria dictated by international mainstream science. On the latter, there has not much demand on local R&D given that TNCs innovate on the basis of R&D conducted in the advanced countries and local private firms, in a bid to be competitive, also prefer to import foreign technology. Government initiated schemes to correct this imbalance - including provisions for public-private collaboration, science parks and firm level research training - have been largely unsuccessful. This state of affairs is largely due to the enactment of macroeconomic policies aimed at opening up the country to foreign competition and privatising state enterprises, without putting in place the necessary measures and incentives to guarantee the investment and to diminish the risks involved in R&D. Firm and focused government intervention is necessary if such trends are to be reversed. The most obvious sphere for intervention is creating a more just society in the region, and thus granting opportunity to education to social groups currently excluded. Other policies have more direct bearing on R&D and include incentives for private sector investment in R&D and hiring of researchers. Most of all, measures must be implemented by all relevant S&T actors in terms of strengthening links among themselves

[1]  Ruy Quadros,et al.  Technological Innovation in Brazilian Industry , 2001 .

[2]  C. Edquist,et al.  Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation , 2013 .

[3]  Kendall W. Stiles Civil Society Empowerment and Multilateral Donors: International Institutions and New International Norms , 1998 .

[4]  Guillermo Cardoza Learning, innovation and growth: a comparative policy approach to East Asia and Latin America , 1997 .

[5]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Research as Capacity Building: The Case of an NGO Facilitated Post-Harvest Innovation System for the Himalayan Hills , 2003 .

[6]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Global cooperation in research , 1998 .

[7]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[8]  J. Katz Efficiency And Equity Aspects Of The , 2002 .

[9]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[10]  Jane M. Russell,et al.  Scientific collaboration of the Mercosur countries as an indicator of Latin American regional activity , 1999 .

[11]  C. Freeman Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[12]  L. Velho,et al.  A construção social da produção científica por mulheres , 1998 .

[13]  Claudio Frischtak Using Knowledge for Development: The Brazilian Experience , 2001 .

[14]  Nicholas S. Vonortas Building competitive firms: technology policy initiatives in Latin America , 2002 .

[15]  Ana María Cetto,et al.  Scientific periodicals in Latin America and the Caribbean: a global perspective , 1998 .

[16]  Nilda Sito,et al.  Ciencia, política y cientificismo , 1971 .

[17]  Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque,et al.  Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries , 2003 .

[18]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[19]  Léa Velho,et al.  Publication and Citation Practices of Brazilian Agricultural Scientists , 1984 .

[20]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  J. Sutz The university–industry–government relations in Latin America , 2000 .

[22]  Rodrigo Arocena,et al.  Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities , 2001 .

[23]  L. Holm-Nielsen,et al.  The evolution of science and technology: Latin America and the Caribbean in comparative perspective , 2002 .

[24]  A. Escobar Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization , 2001 .

[25]  Léa Velho,et al.  University-Industry-Government Relations on the Periphery: The University of Campinas, Brazil , 1998 .

[26]  L. F. Rius Roles de género y mujeres académicas , 2000 .

[27]  Ramón López The Policy Roots of Socioeconomic Stagnation and Environmental Implosion: Latin America 1950-2000 , 2003 .

[28]  Ludovico Alcorta,et al.  Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin America and the Caribbean , 1998 .

[29]  Guillermo Perry,et al.  Closing the Gap in Education and Technology , 2003 .

[30]  J. Katz,et al.  Structural reforms and technological behaviour: The sources and nature of technological change in Latin America in the 1990s , 2001 .

[31]  R. Urzua Regional overview: Latin America and the Caribbean , 2002 .

[32]  D. Chudnovsky,et al.  Política tecnológica en la Argentina: ¿hay algo más que laissez faire?* , 1996 .

[33]  Hernán Thomas,et al.  El pensamiento en ciencia, tecnología y sociedad en Latinoamérica : una interpretación política de su trayectoria , 1996 .