Japanese and Chinese Learners' Acquisition of the Narrow‐Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English

I investigated the acquisition of narrow-range rules governing the dative alternation (Pinker, 1989) by adult L2 learners of English: 32 English speakers, 32 Japanese speakers and 32 Chinese speakers participated. I investigated 4 of Pinker's narrow-range verb classes - the Throw class, the Push class, the Tell class, and the Whisper class: Participants rated the acceptability of prepositional and double object datives containing both made-up and real verbs in these subclasses. Both Japanese and Chinese speakers distinguished double object datives containing Tell-class verbs from those with Whisper-class verbs, but failed to distinguish double object datives containing Throw-class verbs from those with Push-class verbs. I suggest that Japanese and Chinese learners' acquisition of the dative alternation in English is governed by the properties of an equivalent structure in their L1 relative to the properties of the target structure

[1]  T. Phillips,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't , 1983 .

[2]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1991 .

[3]  Roger Hawkins,et al.  Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers , 1987 .

[4]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  The logical problem of foreign language learning , 1989 .

[5]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[6]  S. Gass,et al.  Language transfer in language learning , 1985 .

[7]  Irene Mazurkewich,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF THE DATIVE ALTERNATION BY SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY , 1984 .

[8]  Lydia White.  Markedness and Second Language Acquisition , 1987, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[9]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation , 1989 .

[10]  A. Sorace.  Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non native grammars of Italian , 1993 .

[11]  Alan Juffs,et al.  Semantics-syntax correspondences in second language acquisition , 1996 .

[12]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  Road and Narrow Constraints on the English Dative Alternation: Some Fundamental Differences Between Native Speakers and Foreign Language Learners , 1992 .

[13]  Alan Juffs,et al.  Learnability and the Lexicon , 1996 .

[14]  Irene Mazurkewich,et al.  The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations , 1984, Cognition.

[15]  Sirpa Mäki,et al.  The computer program , 1980 .

[16]  Lydia White,et al.  Argument structure in second language acquisition , 1991, Journal of French Language Studies.

[17]  Kathryn Elizabeth Wolfe-Quintero.  The representation and acquisition of the lexical structure of English dative verbs : experimental studies of native English speakers and Japanese and Chinese adult learners of English , 1992 .

[18]  Naoko Yoshinaga.  Acquisition of the English Dative Construction by the Japanese , 1992 .

[19]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar , 1989 .

[20]  Lydia White,et al.  Psych verbs In Second Language Acquisition , 1999 .

[21]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Acquiring linking rules and argument structures in a second language: The unaccusative/unergative distinction , 1995 .

[22]  Georgia M. Green,et al.  Semantics and Syntactic Regularity , 1974 .

[23]  Lynn Eubank,et al.  The current state of interlanguage , 1995 .

[24]  Richard Thomas Oehrle,et al.  The grammatical status of the English dative alternation , 1976 .