A hybrid model of component sharing and platform modularity for optimal product family design

Today's industry faces new challenges such as diverse customer demands, shorter product development cycles and cost pressure, which compel manufacturing firms to change their production paradigm from one-size-fits-all mass production toward mass customisation. Over the past decades, modular design has received great attention as a key enabler for mass customisation, and component sharing and platform modularity have been quite popular strategies for modular design. While modular design approaches and their strategies offer a number of advantages such as late product differentiation and changeability, there are unfortunately negative aspects, for example, sales loss due to reduced performance compared to integral design approaches, which have received little attention. Therefore, we propose a hybrid model of the two strategies in order to develop the most profitable product family. A detailed numerical analysis provides empirical support for the feasibility and effectiveness of the hybrid model.

[1]  Ci Chen,et al.  Product platform design through clustering analysis and information theoretical approach , 2008 .

[2]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[3]  E. H. Bowman,et al.  Redesigning the firm , 1995 .

[4]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  PRODUCT FAMILY AND PLATFORM PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION , 2003, DAC 2003.

[5]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[6]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[7]  James D. Dana,et al.  Remark on "Appropriateness and Impact of Platform - Based Product Development" , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Power of Product Platforms , 1997 .

[9]  Venkat Allada,et al.  Scalable Product Family Design: Case Study of Axial Piston Pumps , 2009 .

[10]  B. Agard,et al.  Data-mining-based methodology for the design of product families , 2004 .

[11]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  INTEGRATED COMPONENT AND SUPPLIER SELECTION FOR A PRODUCT FAMILY , 1999 .

[12]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Improving cost effectiveness in an existing product line using component product platforms1 , 2010 .

[13]  Sue Newell,et al.  Component sharing in complex products and systems: challenges, solutions, and practical implications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Strategies for Product Variety: Lessons From the Auto Industry , 1995 .

[15]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-Based Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[17]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[18]  Juite Wang,et al.  An overlapping process model to assess schedule risk for new product development , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Broader product line: a necessity to achieve success? , 1990 .

[20]  Hui Li,et al.  An Approach for Product Line Design Selection under Uncertainty and Competition , 2002 .

[21]  Robert L. Armacost,et al.  Review of techniques for optimizing multiple quality characteristics in product development , 1996 .

[22]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation , 1997 .

[23]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design , 2006 .

[24]  Mustafa Uzumeri,et al.  Managing Product Families , 1996 .