Care, Monitoring, and Companionship: Views on Care Robots from Older People and Their Carers

This paper is a discussion of some of the ethical issues relevant to the use of social robots to care for older people in their homes, drawing on qualitative data collected as part of the Acceptable robotiCs COMPanions for AgeiNg Years project. We consider some of the tensions that can be created between older people, their formal (professional) carers, and their informal carers (for example friends or relatives), when a care robot is introduced into the home of an older person. As examples of these tensions, we discuss the use of the care robot as a monitor of older people and carers, for example to ensure older people’s compliance with healthcare regimes, or to police the behaviour of carers to ensure that they are complying with professional guidelines. We also consider the use of care robots in a companionship role for older people, and describe the importance of clearly-delineated roles for care robots. The paper concludes that older people’s autonomy can be limited in the short term in order to protect their longer-term autonomy, and that even if care robots should primarily be considered as being for healthcare rather than for companionship, they might still be used sensitively so that their interference with the companionship role is minimised.

[1]  Amanda J. C. Sharkey,et al.  Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people , 2014, Ethics and Information Technology.

[2]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  Roger Bemelmans,et al.  Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. , 2012, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[4]  G. Livingston,et al.  The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review. , 2008, Age and ageing.

[5]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.

[6]  Peter Singer,et al.  Practical Ethics: Contents , 2011 .

[7]  Heather Draper,et al.  Telecare, Surveillance, and the Welfare State , 2012, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[8]  Shannon Vallor.  Carebots and Caregivers: Sustaining the Ethical Ideal of Care in the Twenty-First Century , 2011, Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics.

[9]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Acceptability of a Teleoperated Android by Senior Citizens in Danish Society , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[10]  Heather Draper,et al.  Using Robots to Modify Demanding or Impolite Behavior of Older People , 2014, ICSR.

[11]  Heather Draper,et al.  DELIVERABLE 6.6 A tentative proposal for an ethical framework , 2014 .

[12]  Jason Borenstein,et al.  Robot caregivers: harbingers of expanded freedom for all? , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[13]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[14]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[15]  Heather Draper,et al.  Robot carers, ethics, and older people , 2014, Ethics and Information Technology.

[16]  I. Oosterlaken,et al.  Design for Development: A Capability Approach , 2009, Design Issues.

[17]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  The Ethics of Enabling Technology , 2007, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[18]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[19]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[20]  Bernard Mayo,et al.  THE POSSIBILITY OF ALTRUISM , 1970 .

[21]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[22]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[23]  Bob Erens,et al.  UK study of elder abuse and neglect of older people: Prevalance survey report , 2007 .

[24]  Mélodie Boulay,et al.  Caregivers' requirements for in-home robotic agent for supporting community-living elderly subjects with cognitive impairment. , 2009, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[25]  B. Glaser.  The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[26]  H. Haja Mydin.  On Liberty , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  Alexander A Kon,et al.  The Role of Empirical Research in Bioethics , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[28]  L. Thomas,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Autonomy , 1990 .

[29]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[30]  Pascal Borry,et al.  What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis , 2004, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[31]  Sandra Bedaf,et al.  Ethical Dimensions of Human-Robot Interactions in the Care of Older People: Insights from 21 Focus Groups Convened in the UK, France and the Netherlands , 2014, ICSR.