Modeling locally varying anisotropy of CO2 emissions in the United States

In a spatial property modeling context, the variables of interest to be modeled often display complex nonlinear features. Techniques to incorporate these nonlinear features, such as multiple point statistics or cummulants, are often complex with input parameters that are difficult to infer. The methodology proposed in this paper uses a classical vector-based definition of locally varying anisotropy to characterize nonlinear features and incorporate locally varying anisotropy into numerical property models. The required input is an exhaustive field of anisotropy orientation and magnitude. The methodology consists of (1) using the shortest path distance between locations to define the covariance between points in space (2) multidimensional scaling of the domain to ensure positive definite kriging equations and (3) estimation or simulation with kriging or sequential Gaussian simulation. The only additional parameter required when kriging or simulating with locally varying anisotropy is the number of dimensions to retain in multidimensional scaling. The methodology is demonstrated on a CO2 emissions data set for the United States in 2002 and shows an improvement in cross validation results as well as a visual reproduction of nonlinear features.

[1]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[2]  P. Guttorp,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation of Nonstationary Spatial Covariance Structure , 1992 .

[3]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[4]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Statistical Modeling of Livestock Waste in Streams , 1996 .

[5]  Don Edwards,et al.  Kriging in estuaries: as the crow flies, or as the fish swims? , 1997 .

[6]  Stephen L. Rathbun,et al.  Spatial modelling in irregularly shaped regions: Kriging estuaries , 1998 .

[7]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[8]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[9]  Jeremy G. Siek,et al.  The Boost Graph Library - User Guide and Reference Manual , 2001, C++ in-depth series.

[10]  Anders Løland,et al.  Spatial covariance modelling in a complex coastal domain by multidimensional scaling , 2003 .

[11]  Frank C. Curriero,et al.  On the Use of Non-Euclidean Distance Measures in Geostatistics , 2007 .

[12]  J. Hoef,et al.  Spatial statistical models that use flow and stream distance , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[13]  Alan Julian Izenman,et al.  Modern Multivariate Statistical Techniques , 2008 .

[14]  Alan Julian Izenman,et al.  Modern Multivariate Statistical Techniques: Regression, Classification, and Manifold Learning , 2008 .

[15]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission fluxes for the United States. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistics with Locally Varying Anisotropy , 2009 .

[17]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Programs for kriging and sequential Gaussian simulation with locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances , 2011, Comput. Geosci..