Using argumentation in text generation

Abstract Text generation is a field of artificial intelligence aiming at producing computer models of natural language production. This paper discusses the use of the theory of ‘Argumentation in Language’ in the field of Text Generation. Most text generators follow the same sequence of steps to produce a coherent paragraph: content determination - selecting of information to include in the text from an underlying computer database; content organization - structuring of the propositions to be included in the text according to an appropriate rhetorical plan; finally lexical choice and syntactic realization - phrasing of the information using appropriate lexical items and syntactically correct constructions. The paper provides examples of the use of argumentative features to influence the generator's decisions throughout the generation process. The introduction of argumentative features allows the designer of a text generator to account for linguistic decisions that were not addressed in previous work, such as the selection of judgment determiners ( many, few ), scalar adjectives ( interesting, difficult ), connotative verbs ( require, necessitate, enjoy, struggle ) and connectives ( but, therefore ). Argumentative features are also used to organize the paragraph in a coherent manner. They are finally used to select appropriate information from a database to satisfy a given persuasive goal. The paper shows how the same descriptive device - the topoi introduced by Anscombre and Ducrot - can serve as the unifying representation level during the whole generation process and build a bridge between the conceptual and linguistic components of the generator.

[1]  Chris Mellish,et al.  Current research in natural language generation , 1990 .

[2]  Ewan Klein,et al.  A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives , 1980 .

[3]  Kathleen McKeown,et al.  Text generation: using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text , 1985 .

[4]  Michael Elhadad,et al.  Generating Connectives , 1990, COLING.

[5]  Laurence Danlos,et al.  The Linguistic Basis of Text Generation , 1987, EACL.

[6]  Michael Elhadad,et al.  Types in Functional Unification Grammars , 1990, ACL.

[7]  Dean G. Blevins,et al.  Introduction 1-2 , 1969 .

[8]  William C. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and Construction of Text Structures , 1987 .

[9]  Jacques Robin,et al.  Lexical Choice in Natural Language Generation , 1990 .

[10]  A. Robinet,et al.  Philosophie et langage , 1982 .

[11]  Pierre-Yves Raccah.  Modelling argumentation and modelling with argumentation , 1990 .

[12]  Wolfgang Hoeppner,et al.  Review of Generating natural language under pragmantic constraints by Edward H. Hovy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1988. , 1990 .

[13]  Michael Elhadad,et al.  A Contrastive Evaluation of Functional Unification Grammar for Surface Language Generation: A Case Study in Choice of Connectives , 1991 .

[14]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues , 1989, ACL.

[15]  Peter Ludlow,et al.  Implicit comparison classes , 1989 .

[16]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  Living wiht Classic: When and How to Use a KL-ONE-Like Language , 1991, Principles of Semantic Networks.

[17]  H. Horacek,et al.  VIE-GEN: a generator for German texts , 1988 .

[18]  William C. Mann,et al.  Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics , 1990 .

[19]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[20]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[21]  O. Ducrot,et al.  Les Mots du discours , 1981 .

[22]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse , 1979 .

[23]  Eduard H. Hovy,et al.  Planning Coherent Multisentential Text , 1988, ACL.

[24]  Eduard Hovy,et al.  Generating Natural Language Under Pragmatic Constraints , 1988 .

[25]  Cecile Paris,et al.  The use of explicit user models in text generation: tailoring to a user's level of expertise , 1988 .

[26]  Manny Rayner,et al.  An Implementable Semantics for Comparative Constructions , 1990, Comput. Linguistics.

[27]  Edward H. Hovy,et al.  Unresolved issues in paragraph planning , 1990 .

[28]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[29]  Helmut Horacek,et al.  An Integrated View of Text Planning , 1992, NLG.

[30]  Michael Elhadad.  Generating Argumentative Judgment Determiners , 1993, AAAI.

[31]  Paul S. Jacobs,et al.  Knowledge-Intensive Natural Language Generation , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[32]  Michael Elhadad,et al.  Generating Adjectives to Express the Speaker's Argumentative Intent , 1991, AAAI.

[33]  J. Anscombre,et al.  L'argumentation dans la langue , 1976 .

[34]  Eduard Hovy,et al.  Approaches to the Planning of Coherent Text , 1991 .

[35]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  A theory of scalar implicature , 1985 .

[36]  Michael Elhadad,et al.  Controlling Content Realization with Functional Unification Grammars , 1992, NLG.

[37]  Oswald Ducrot,et al.  Le dire et le dit , 1984 .

[38]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Abducing Temporal Discourse , 1992, NLG.