Generalized Hopfield network based structural optimization using sequential unconstrained minimization technique with additional penalty strategy

This paper presents and examines a neuron-like framework of the generalized Hopfield network (GHN) that is capable to solve nonlinear engineering optimization problems with mixed discrete, integer and real continuous variables. The sequential unconstrained minimization technique (SUMT) was applied to construct the GHN for dealing with the design constraints. An additional penalty function for dealing with the discrete and integer variables was then imposed on the formulation of SUMT to construct an energy function of GHN for formulating the neuron-like dynamical system. The numerical solution process for such a dynamic system is simply solving a set of simultaneous first-order ordinary differential equations (ODE) that is the main feature of this optimization method. The experimental examples showed the presenting strategy is reliable. The suitable values or the adaptation technique for some parameters in computation was discussed in the paper. The presenting strategy indeed provides an alternative way of handling the engineering optimization dynamically and expands the usage of ODE. An asymmetrical three-bar truss design, a reinforced concrete beam design and a 10-bar structural design are contributed to illustrate the presenting neuron-like network method.

[1]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Neural networks for optimization and signal processing , 1993 .

[2]  Leon O. Chua,et al.  Neural networks for nonlinear programming , 1988 .

[3]  H. Amir,et al.  Nonlinear Mixed-Discrete Structural Optimization , 1989 .

[4]  Singiresu S Rao,et al.  A NEURAL NETWORK BASED APPROACH TO MECHANICAL DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1992 .

[5]  Shih Cj,et al.  Hopfield neuron based nonlinear constrained programming to fuzzy structural engineering optimization , 1999 .

[6]  Singiresu S. Rao Engineering Optimization : Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[7]  Leon O. Chua,et al.  Nonlinear programming without computation , 1984 .

[8]  C. J. Shih,et al.  Fuzzy and improved penalty approaches for multiobjective mixed-discrete optimization in structural systems , 1997 .

[9]  Judith S. Liebman,et al.  Discrete Structural Optimization , 1981 .

[10]  John J. Hopfield,et al.  Simple 'neural' optimization networks: An A/D converter, signal decision circuit, and a linear programming circuit , 1986 .

[11]  R. G. Fenton,et al.  A MIXED INTEGER-DISCRETE-CONTINUOUS PROGRAMMING METHOD AND ITS APPLICATION TO ENGINEERING DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1991 .

[12]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Rajeev,et al.  Discrete Optimization of Structures Using Genetic Algorithms , 1992 .

[14]  Gintaras V. Reklaitis,et al.  Nonlinear Optimization Using Generalized Hopfield Networks , 1989, Neural Computation.