Subjective Measurements of In-Flight Sleep, Circadian Variation, and Their Relationship with Fatigue.

BACKGROUND This study examined whether subjective measurements of in-flight sleep could be a reliable alternative to actigraphic measurements for monitoring pilot fatigue in a large-scale survey. METHODS Pilots (3-pilot crews) completed a 1-page survey on outbound and inbound long-haul flights crossing 1-7 time zones (N = 586 surveys) between 53 city pairs with 1-d layovers. Across each flight, pilots documented flight start and end times, break times, and in-flight sleep duration and quality if they attempted sleep. They also rated their fatigue (Samn-Perelli Crew Status Check) and sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) at top of descent (TOD). Mixed model ANCOVA was used to identify independent factors associated with sleep duration, quality, and TOD measures. Domicile time was used as a surrogate measure of circadian phase. RESULTS Sleep duration increased by 10.2 min for every 1-h increase in flight duration. Sleep duration and quality varied by break start time, with significantly more sleep obtained during breaks starting between (domicile) 22:00-01:59 and 02:00-05:59 compared to earlier breaks. Pilots were more fatigued and sleepy at TOD on flights arriving between 02:00-05:59 and 06:00-09:59 domicile time compared to other flights. With every 1-h increase in sleep duration, sleepiness ratings at TOD decreased by 0.6 points and fatigue ratings decreased by 0.4 points. DISCUSSION The present findings are consistent with previous actigraphic studies, suggesting that self-reported sleep duration is a reliable alternative to actigraphic sleep in this type of study, with use of validated measures, sufficiently large sample sizes, and where fatigue risk is expected to be low. van den Berg MJ, Wu LJ, Gander PH. Subjective measurements of in-flight sleep, circadian variation, and their relationship with fatigue. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016; 87(10):869-875.