A Two Phase Method for Solving the Distribution Problem in a Fuzzy Setting

In this paper, a new method for the solution of distribution problem in a fuzzy setting is presented. It consists of two phases. In the first of them, the problem is formulated as the classical, fully fuzzy transportation problem. A new, straightforward numerical method for solving this problem is proposed. This method is implemented using the α-cut approximation of fuzzy values and the probability approach to interval comparison. The method allows us to provide the straightforward fuzzy extension of a simplex method. It is important that the results are fuzzy values. To validate our approach, these results were compared with those obtained using the competing method and those we got using the Monte–Carlo method. In the second phase, the results obtained in the first one (the fuzzy profit) are used as the natural constraints on the parameters of multiobjective task. In our approach to the solution of distribution problem, the fuzzy local criteria based on the overall profit and contracts breaching risks are used. The particular local criteria are aggregated with the use of most popular aggregation modes. To obtain a compromise solution, the compromise general criterion is introduced, which is the aggregation of aggregating modes with the use of level-2 fuzzy sets. As the result, a new two phase method for solving the fuzzy, nonlinear, multiobjective distribution problem aggregating the fuzzy local criteria based on the overall profit and contracts breaching risks has been developed. Based on the comparison of the results obtained using our method with those obtained by competing one, and on the results of the sensitivity analysis, we can conclude that the method may be successfully used in applications. Numerical examples illustrate the proposed method.

[1]  M. Montaz Ali,et al.  Population set-based global optimization algorithms: some modifications and numerical studies , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications , 1986 .

[3]  Adil Baykasoglu,et al.  An analysis of fully fuzzy linear programming with fuzzy decision variables through logistics network design problem , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  Pavel V. Sevastjanov,et al.  Two-objective method for crisp and fuzzy interval comparison in optimization , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (II) , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  Beyza Ahlatçioglu Ozkok,et al.  An approach for finding fuzzy optimal and approximate fuzzy optimal solution of fully fuzzy linear programming problems with mixed constraints , 2016, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  Tapan Kumar Roy,et al.  A new fuzzy multi-objective programming: Entropy based geometric programming and its application of transportation problems , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A preference aggregation method through the estimation of utility intervals , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  Behrouz Kheirfam,et al.  The dual simplex method and sensitivity analysis for fuzzy linear programming with symmetric trapezoidal numbers , 2013, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[10]  P.Ya. Ekel,et al.  Synthetic realization approach to fuzzy global optimization via gamma algorithm , 2005, Math. Comput. Model..

[11]  Amelia Bilbao-Terol,et al.  Linear programming with fuzzy parameters: An interactive method resolution , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Logic and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1974, IFIP Congress.

[13]  D. Dubois,et al.  Social choice axioms for fuzzy set aggregation , 1991 .

[14]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (II) , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[15]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[16]  Andrzej Piegat,et al.  Fuzzy Modeling and Control , 2001 .

[17]  Moti Schneider,et al.  On the use of interval mathematics in fuzzy expert systems , 1994, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[18]  P. Sevastianov,et al.  MCDM in a fuzzy setting: Investment projects assessment application , 2006 .

[19]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[20]  Jagdeep Kaur,et al.  Mehar’s method for solving fully fuzzy linear programming problems with L-R fuzzy parameters , 2013 .

[21]  P. Sevastianov Numerical methods for interval and fuzzy number comparison based on the probabilistic approach and Dempster-Shafer theory , 2007 .

[22]  E. E. Ammar,et al.  Study on multiobjective transportation problem with fuzzy numbers , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[23]  Adil Baykasoglu,et al.  A direct solution approach based on constrained fuzzy arithmetic and metaheuristic for fuzzy transportation problems , 2019, Soft Comput..

[24]  H. Zimmermann Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions , 1978 .

[25]  Gautam Mitra,et al.  Mathematical Models for Decision Support , 1987, NATO ASI Series.

[26]  Maged George Iskander A computational comparison between two evaluation criteria in fuzzy multiobjective linear programs using possibility programming , 2008, Comput. Math. Appl..

[27]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Multiple objective decision-making using fuzzy sets , 1977 .

[28]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Latent connectives in human decision making , 1980 .

[29]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[30]  H. Isermann The enumeration of all efficient solutions for a linear multiple-objective transportation problem , 1979 .

[31]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Ranking Fuzzy Numbers Using a-Weighted Valuations , 2000, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[32]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Decisions and evaluations by hierarchical aggregation of information , 1983 .