Fracture behaviour of cartilage-on-bone in response to repeated impact loading.

Cartilage-on-bone composite samples, of differing degrees of matrix stiffness of the cartilage, were subjected to repeated dynamic compression. In all but the most compliant cartilage, fractures always presented at 45 degrees to the articular surface and extended only to the boundary between the intermediate and deep zones of the cartilage matrix. Fractures were not initiated in cartilage of very low matrix stiffness, in which the articular surface and superficial zone are always poorly constructed, nor in high-stiffness cartilage in which the articular surface and superficial zone had been shaved off. It is postulated that an intact superficial layer is necessary for fracture initiation and that propagation of the fracture into the intermediate zone occurs along the planes of maximum resolved shear stress. Prolonged impaction can cause crushing of the underlying subchondral bone, the cartilage remaining structurally and mechanically unchanged. Thus under high rates of loading stress is transmitted to the bone, whilst the cartilage either remains unaffected or fails in a manner characteristic of a brittle material.

[1]  W M Lai,et al.  An analysis of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  I L Paul,et al.  A comparison of the dynamic force transmitting properties of subchondral bone and articular cartilage. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J B Finlay,et al.  Survival of articular cartilage after controlled impact. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  Broom Nd,et al.  The collagenous architecture of articular cartilage--a synthesis of ultrastructure and mechanical function. , 1986 .

[5]  D. Marra,et al.  New structural concepts of articular cartilage demonstrated with a physical model. , 1985, Connective tissue research.

[6]  Broom Nd,et al.  Further insights into the structural principles governing the function of articular cartilage. , 1984 .

[7]  S. L. Rice,et al.  Impact strength of materials , 1972 .

[8]  J. E. Gordon,et al.  Structures: Or Why Things Don't Fall Down , 1978 .

[9]  I L Paul,et al.  Does cartilage compliance reduce skeletal impact loads? The relative force-attenuating properties of articular cartilage, synovial fluid, periarticular soft tissues and bone. , 1970, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  C W McCutchen,et al.  Cartilages is poroelastic, not viscoelastic (including an exact theorem about strain energy and viscous loss, and an order of magnitude relation for equilibration time). , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. J. Crawford,et al.  Mechanics of engineering materials , 1986 .

[12]  N. Broom,et al.  A biomechanical profile across the patellar groove articular cartilage: implications for defining matrix health. , 1988, Journal of anatomy.

[13]  C. Armstrong,et al.  An analysis of the stresses in a thin layer of articular cartilage in a synovial joint. , 1986, Engineering in medicine.

[14]  G. Meachim Light microscopy of Indian ink preparations of fibrillated cartilage. , 1972, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.