Psychometric Validation and Meaningful Change Thresholds of the New Nasal Polyposis Symptom Diary

OBJECTIVES The Nasal Polyposis Symptom Diary (NPSD) is a novel and short patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool specifically developed to assess important and relevant symptoms reported by patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). We evaluated the psychometric properties of 4 predefined NPSD-derived scores intended to support symptom-improvement assessments of investigational therapies for inclusion in product labeling. METHODS Five hundred eighteen patients with severe CRSwNP from a Phase III clinical trial (NCT03401229) completed the NPSD, comprising 11 items: 8 symptom-specific, 2 symptom-impact, and 1 optional medication-compliance. The psychometric characteristics of 3 single-item symptom scores (Nasal Blockage Score [NBS], Nasal Congestion Score [NCS], and Difficulty with Sense of Smell Score [DSS]) and a Total Symptom Score (TSS, summary of the 8 symptom-specific items) were evaluated for reliability, validity, and ability to detect change. Within-patient meaningful change thresholds (MCTs) were established using anchor- and distribution-based methods. Comparative PROs included the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). RESULTS The TSS exhibited strong internal consistency (Cronbach α = .88) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >.80). Correlation between the TSS and SNOT-22 total score indicated good convergent validity (r = .70). All 4 NPSD scores demonstrated known-groups validity (significant differences among subgroups of patients with predetermined disease severity levels based on PGI-S categories) and were sensitive to detect change in patients' clinical status (significant differences among subgroups of patients with reported changes between 2 time-points in PGI-S and Patient Global Impression of Change scores). MCTs for improvement were established at 1.0 point for NBS, NCS, and DSS, and 4.0 points for TSS. CONCLUSION These findings support the reliability, validity, and suitability of the 4 NPSD-derived scores for evaluating treatment effect on CRSwNP symptoms and their use in clinical trials with predetermined MCTs for improvement.

[1]  V. Shih,et al.  Measuring the patient experience of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: qualitative development of a novel symptom diary , 2021, International forum of allergy & rhinology.

[2]  C. Bachert,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial. , 2021, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  Naweed I Chowdhury,et al.  Does Medical Therapy Improve SinoNasal Outcomes Test–22 Domain Scores? An Analysis of Clinically Important Differences , 2018, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  J. Mullol,et al.  Subtyping of polyposis nasi: phenotypes, endotypes and comorbidities , 2018, Allergo Journal International.

[5]  L. Johansson,et al.  Relative frequencies of symptoms and risk factors among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps using a case-control study , 2018, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[6]  A. Peters,et al.  Evaluating metrics of responsiveness using patient‐reported outcome measures in chronic rhinosinusitis , 2017, International forum of allergy & rhinology.

[7]  Z. Soler,et al.  Low 22‐item sinonasal outcome test scores in chronic rhinosinusitis: Why do patients seek treatment? , 2017, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  C. Hopkins,et al.  Patient-reported outcome measures for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and quality assessment. , 2015, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[9]  C. von Buchwald,et al.  Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Coexisting Asthma: A Systematic Review , 2015, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[10]  W. Fokkens,et al.  Symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  V. Lund,et al.  Psychometric validity of the 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test , 2009, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[12]  V. Djukic,et al.  The analysis of clinical characteristics of the chronic rhinosinusitis: complicated and uncomplicated form , 2008, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[13]  Klas Svensson,et al.  Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire. , 2005, Respiratory medicine.

[14]  J. Mullol,et al.  Nasal polyposis and its impact on quality of life: comparison between the effects of medical and surgical treatments , 2005, Allergy.

[15]  C. Salome,et al.  Symptoms of persistent allergic rhinitis during a full calendar year in house dust mite‐sensitive subjects , 2004, Allergy.

[16]  J. Piccirillo,et al.  Psychometric and Clinimetric Validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (Snot-20) , 2002, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  Joseph L. Fleiss,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments: Fleiss/The Design , 1999 .

[18]  K. Cook,et al.  Moving from significance to real-world meaning: methods for interpreting change in clinical outcome assessment scores , 2017, Quality of Life Research.

[19]  Jacob Cohen QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer , 1992 .