Formation of large NAT particles and denitrification in polar stratosphere: possible role of cosmic rays and effect of solar activity

The formation of large nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) particles has important implications for denitrification and ozone depletion. Existing theories have difficulty in ex- plaining the formation of large NAT particles at temperatures above the ice frost point, which has been observed recently over wide Arctic regions. Our analyses reveal that high- energy comic ray particles might induce the freezing of su- percooled HNO3-H2O-H2SO4 droplets when they penetrate these thermodynamically unstable droplets. The cosmic ray- induced freezing (CRIF) appears to be consistent with the ob- served, highly selective formation of NAT particles. We sug- gest a possible physical process behind the CRIF mechanism: the reorientation of polar solution molecules into the crys- talline configuration in the strong electrical fields of moving secondary ions generated by passing cosmic rays. A simple formula connecting the CRIF rate to cosmic ray flux is de- rived with an undefined parameter constrained by observed NAT formation rates. Our simulations indicate that strong solar proton events (SPEs) may significantly enhance the for- mation of large NAT particles and denitrification. The CRIF mechanism offers a possible explanation for the observed high correlations between the thin nitrate-rich layers in polar ice cores and major SPEs, and the observed enhancement in the aerosol backscattering ratio at PSC layers shortly after an SPE and the significant precipitation velocity of the enhanced PSC layers. The key uncertainty in the CRIF mechanism is the probability (P) of freezing when a CR particle hits a ther- modynamically, unstable STS droplet. Further studies are needed to either confirm or reject the CRIF hypothesis.

[1]  J. M. Reeves,et al.  Particle Formation by Ion Nucleation in the Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere , 2003, Science.

[2]  Kenneth S. Carslaw,et al.  Ion‐aerosol‐cloud processes in the lower atmosphere , 2003 .

[3]  M. Molina,et al.  Study of finely divided aqueous systems as an aid to understanding the formation mechanism of polar stratospheric clouds: Case of HNO3/H2O and H2SO4/H2O systems , 2003 .

[4]  J. Liley,et al.  Thirty years of in situ stratospheric aerosol size distribution measurements from Laramie, Wyoming (41°N), using balloon‐borne instruments , 2003 .

[5]  J. Kirkby,et al.  Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate , 2002, Science.

[6]  O. Toon,et al.  Impact of polar stratospheric cloud particle composition, number density, and lifetime on denitrification , 2002 .

[7]  C. Voigt,et al.  Microphysical mesoscale simulations of polar stratospheric cloud formation constrained by in situ measurements of chemical and optical cloud properties , 2002 .

[8]  M. Chipperfield,et al.  A vortex‐scale simulation of the growth and sedimentation of large nitric acid hydrate particles , 2002 .

[9]  M. Kurylo,et al.  An overview of the SOLVE/THESEO 2000 campaign , 2002 .

[10]  H. Reiss,et al.  Laboratory Evidence for Surface Nucleation of Solid Polar Stratospheric Cloud Particles , 2002 .

[11]  B. Luo,et al.  Homogeneous nucleation of NAD and NAT in liquid stratospheric aerosols: insufficient to explain denitrification , 2002 .

[12]  F. Yu.  Altitude variations of cosmic ray induced production of aerosols: Implications for global cloudiness and climate , 2002 .

[13]  E. Browell,et al.  Microphysical modeling of the 1999–2000 Arctic winter: 1. Polar stratospheric clouds, denitrification, and dehydration , 2002 .

[14]  R. Turco,et al.  Ionic clusters in the polar winter stratosphere , 2001 .

[15]  K. G. McCracken,et al.  Solar cosmic ray events for the period 1561–1994: 1. Identification in polar ice, 1561–1950 , 2001 .

[16]  James M. Russell,et al.  Northern hemisphere atmospheric effects due to the July 2000 Solar Proton Event , 2001 .

[17]  O. Toon,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE: Enhanced: Solving the PSC Mystery , 2001 .

[18]  G. Seidler,et al.  Laboratory investigation of possible ice nucleation by ionizing radiation in pure water at tropospheric temperatures , 2001 .

[19]  T. L. Thompson,et al.  The Detection of Large HNO3-Containing Particles in the Winter Arctic Stratosphere , 2001, Science.

[20]  Herwig G. Paretzke,et al.  Inelastic-collision cross sections of liquid water for interactions of energetic protons , 2000 .

[21]  Santee,et al.  Quantifying denitrification and its effect on ozone recovery , 2000, Science.

[22]  R. Turco,et al.  Ultrafine aerosol formation via ion‐mediated nucleation , 2000 .

[23]  Stanley C. Solomon,et al.  Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history , 1999 .

[24]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Aerosol silica as a possible candidate for the heterogeneous formation of nitric acid hydrates in the stratosphere , 1999 .

[25]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Arctic ozone loss due to denitrification , 1999, Science.

[26]  G. Bazilevskaya,et al.  On The Stratospheric Measurements of Cosmic Rays , 1998 .

[27]  S. Lipson,et al.  Electrofreezing effect and nucleation of ice crystals in free growth experiments , 1998 .

[28]  David Rind,et al.  Increased polar stratospheric ozone losses and delayed eventual recovery owing to increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations , 1998, Nature.

[29]  M. Leutbecher,et al.  Particle microphysics and chemistry in remotely observed mountain polar stratospheric clouds , 1998 .

[30]  O. Shumilov,et al.  Enhancement of stratospheric aerosols after solar proton event , 1996 .

[31]  P. Crutzen,et al.  The unsuitability of meteoritic and other nuclei for polar stratospheric cloud freezing , 1996 .

[32]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Do stratospheric aerosol droplets freeze above the ice frost point , 1995 .

[33]  M. Molina,et al.  Composition and freezing of aqueous H2SO4/HNO3 solutions under polar stratospheric conditions , 1994 .

[34]  B. Tinsley.  Reply [to “Comment on ‘Apparent tropospheric response to MeV‐GeV particle flux variations: A connection via electrofreezing of supercooled water in high‐level clouds?’ by Brian A. Tinsley and Glen W. Deen”] , 1993 .

[35]  Glen W. Deen,et al.  Apparent tropospheric response to MeV‐GeV particle flux variations: A connection via electrofreezing of supercooled water in high‐level clouds? , 1991 .

[36]  J. Gille,et al.  Revised reference model for nitric acid , 1987 .

[37]  B. Vonnegut,et al.  Initiation of Freezing in Supercooled Cloud Droplets by Ionizing Radiation. , 1980 .

[38]  J. Klett,et al.  Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation , 1978, Nature.

[39]  T. Dunkerton,et al.  On the Mean Meridional Mass Motions of the Stratosphere and Mesosphere , 1978 .

[40]  G. Vali,et al.  Heterogeneous Freezing Nucleation in Electric Fields , 1975 .

[41]  D. Fischer,et al.  Atmospheric Science , 1973, Nature.

[42]  N. Varshneya.  THEORY OF RADIATION DETECTION THROUGH SUPERCOOLED LIQUID. , 1971 .

[43]  J. Latham,et al.  The Electrofreezing of Supercooled Water Drops , 1969 .

[44]  N. Varshneya.  Detecting Radiation with a Supercooled Liquid , 1969, Nature.

[45]  R. Hans.  The Effect of an External Electric Field on the Supercooling of Water Drops , 1963 .

[46]  L. Loeb,et al.  Fundamental Processes of Electrical Discharge in Gases , 1940, Nature.