Using human intellectual tasks as guidelines to systematically model medical cyber-physical systems

In a medical environment such as Intensive Care Unit, there are many possible reasons to cause errors, and one important reason is the effect of human intellectual tasks. In this paper, we first provide five categories of generic intellectual tasks of humans, where tasks among each category may lead to potential medical errors. Then, we present an integrated modeling framework to model a medical Cyber-Physical-Human System (CPHSystem) and use UPPAAL as the foundation to integrate and verify the whole medical CPHSystem design models. When designing a medical CPHSystem, developers need to consider whether the system design can mitigate the errors caused by these tasks or not. With a verified and comprehensive model, we can design a more accurate and acceptable system. We use a cardiac arrest resuscitation guidance and navigation system (CAR-GNSystem) as the motivation example for such medical CPHSystem modeling. Experimental results show that the CPHSystem models help determine system design flaws and can mitigate the potential medical errors caused by the human intellectual tasks.

[1]  J F Toole,et al.  Validation of the ACAS TIA/stroke algorithm , 1997, Neurology.

[2]  Michael D. Harrison,et al.  Modelling and analysing the interactive behaviour of an infusion pump , 2011, Electron. Commun. Eur. Assoc. Softw. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Y. Donchin,et al.  A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit , 2022 .

[4]  Wang Yi,et al.  Uppaal in a nutshell , 1997, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer.

[5]  Nathan Shapiro,et al.  The costs and cost-effectiveness of an integrated sepsis treatment protocol , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[6]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Validating interactive system design through the verification of formal task and system models , 1995, EHCI.

[7]  Daniel Talmor,et al.  Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care* , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[9]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  A tool-supported design framework for safety critical interactive systems , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Ellen J. Bass,et al.  A Systematic Approach to Model Checking Human–Automation Interaction Using Task Analytic Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[11]  Natarajan Shankar,et al.  The SAL Language Manual , 2003 .

[12]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents , 1993, Computer.

[13]  Daniel Talmor,et al.  A blueprint for a sepsis protocol. , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[14]  S.P. Miller,et al.  Mode confusion analysis of a flight guidance system using formal methods , 2003, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2003. DASC '03. The 22nd.

[15]  Roger D. White,et al.  Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[16]  Nancy Strzyzewski,et al.  Common Errors Made in Resuscitation of Respiratory and Cardiac Arrest , 2006, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.