Comparison of humerus length with femur length in fetuses with Down syndrome.

A recent report by FitzSimmons et al. demonstrated a greater frequency of upper- versus lower-extremity shortening in autopsies of second-trimester fetuses with trisomy 21. We undertook this study to determine whether this upper-limb shortening could be detected by prenatal ultrasonography in the second trimester and therefore identify fetuses at risk for trisomy 21. A retrospective review of all prenatal sonograms preceding genetic amniocentesis was conducted. Between 1987 and 1990 11 consecutive fetuses between 15 and 22 weeks' gestation with trisomy 21 were identified by genetic amniocentesis. Femur and humerus lengths were plotted on growth curves created from 1470 normal patients between 12 and 26 weeks. Gestational age was confirmed by last menstrual period and biparietal diameter. In fetuses with trisomy 21, seven of 11 humeri were less than 5th percentile, for a sensitivity of 64%, whereas only two of 11 femurs were less than 5th percentile, for a sensitivity of 18%. Biparietal diameter/femur length and biparietal diameter/humerus length ratios were also tested to predict Down syndrome. In only 2 of 11 cases was the biparietal diameter/femur length ratio greater than 95th percentile, whereas the biparietal diameter/humerus length ratio was greater than 95th percentile in 7 of 11. Since all seven were identified by shortened humerus alone, we conclude that humerus length versus gestational age is the simplest and most effective screen. The positive predictive value of an abnormally short humerus length in detecting Down syndrome was 6.8% in our population where the prevalence of Down syndrome was 1 of 173. The present study supports the observations of FitzSimmons et al. that shortened humerus length has a greater sensitivity than femur length in cases of trisomy 21. We conclude that in fetuses at risk for trisomy 21 humerus length should be determined, because it may, if shortened, aid in the prenatal diagnosis.

[1]  R. Filly,et al.  Severe nonimmune hydrops fetalis: sonographic evaluation. , 1984, Radiology.

[2]  B. Harlow,et al.  Hypoplasia of the middle phalanx of the fifth digit. A feature of the second trimester fetus with Down's syndrome. , 1990, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  D. Nyberg,et al.  Prenatal sonographic findings of Down syndrome: Review of 94 cases , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Gilbert Wm,et al.  Fetal omphalocele: associated malformations and chromosomal defects. , 1987 .

[5]  J. Wladimiroff,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis and management of congenital heart defect: significance of associated fetal anomalies and prenatal chromosome studies. , 1985, American journal of medical genetics.

[6]  T. Shepard,et al.  Long-bone growth in fetuses with Down syndrome. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  H. Saal,et al.  Screening for fetal Down's syndrome in pregnancy by measuring maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R L Berkowitz,et al.  Ultrasound Detection of Down Syndrome: Is it Really Possible? , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  J. Hobbins,et al.  Prenatal Diagnosis of Duodenal Atresia: Does It Make Any Difference? , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Fetal cystic hygroma. Cause and natural history. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  B. Benacerraf,et al.  Sonographic identification of second-trimester fetuses with Down's syndrome. , 1987 .

[12]  M Mahoney,et al.  A sonographic screening method for Down syndrome. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Humeral shortening in second-trimester fetuses with Down syndrome. , 1991 .