Overload strategy of transmission and transformation equipment for safety operation

Due to the continuing need for power demand, it's necessary to increase the utilization of existing transmission and transformation equipment. To achieve that point, overload strategies under safe operation are discussed in this paper. Since dynamic line rating (DLR) is considered, the capacity and resistance of the overhead line, as well as risk of the power grid are all calculated under real-time environment and actual line situation. Overhead lines' overload strategy is proposed with the precondition of risk not exceeding the risk value calculated in the traditional method. In addition, transformers' overload operation needs to be applied in some scenarios. Overload strategy of transformers is also discussed under the limits of winding hot spot temperature and failure rate in our study, to ensure the reliability and safety. Finally, the validity of our overload strategy is illustrated by a series of simulations.

[1]  W. Li,et al.  Risk evaluation of transmission system operation modes and its application at British Columbia Transmission Corporation , 2004 .

[2]  J Fu,et al.  Wind cooling effect on dynamic overhead line ratings , 2010, 45th International Universities Power Engineering Conference UPEC2010.

[3]  S.M. Mahajan,et al.  Effects of Thermal Accelerated Ageing on a Medium Voltage Oil-Immersed Current Transformer , 2008, Conference Record of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation.

[4]  D. J. Morrow,et al.  Modelling and prediction techniques for dynamic overhead line rating , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[5]  Tony Yip,et al.  Dynamic line rating protection for wind farm connections , 2009, 2009 CIGRE/IEEE PES Joint Symposium Integration of Wide-Scale Renewable Resources Into the Power Delivery System.

[6]  Li Jing,et al.  Research of risk-based security assessment of power system , 2011, 2011 4th International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT).

[7]  I. Albizu,et al.  Dynamic line rating systems for wind power integration , 2012, IEEE Power and Energy Society Conference and Exposition in Africa: Intelligent Grid Integration of Renewable Energy Resources (PowerAfrica).

[8]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  Power System Coherency and Model Reduction , 2019, Power System Modeling, Computation, and Control.

[9]  Gehao Sheng,et al.  Risk assessment of transmission dynamic line rating based on Monte Carlo , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power Engineering and Automation Conference.

[10]  Jin-O Kim,et al.  Prediction of Dynamic Line Rating Based on Assessment Risk by Time Series Weather Model , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[11]  Lingfeng Wang,et al.  Balancing risk and cost in fuzzy economic dispatch including wind power penetration based on particle swarm optimization , 2008 .

[12]  K. Pandiarajan,et al.  Overload alleviation in electric power system using fuzzy logic , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer, Communication and Electrical Technology (ICCCET).

[13]  Jiang Xiuchen Operation Risk Assessment of a Transmission Line Dynamic Line Rating System , 2011 .

[14]  Tony Yip,et al.  Dynamic line rating protection for wind farm connections , 2009 .

[15]  R. Siregar,et al.  Thermal monitoring on power transformers , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis.

[16]  Brendan Fox,et al.  Partial least squares modelling for dynamic overhead line ratings , 2011, 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech.