Application of firefly algorithm to the dynamic model updating problem

Model updating can be considered as a branch of optimization problems in which calibration of the finite element (FE) model is undertaken by comparing the modal properties of the actual structure with these of the FE predictions. The attainment of a global solution in a multi dimensional search space is a challenging problem. The nature-inspired algorithms have gained increasing attention in the previous decade for solving such complex optimization problems. This study applies the novel Firefly Algorithm (FA), a global optimization search technique, to a dynamic model updating problem. This is to the authors’ best knowledge the first time FA is applied to model updating. The working of FA is inspired by the flashing characteristics of fireflies. Each firefly represents a randomly generated solution which is assigned brightness according to the value of the objective function. The physical structure under consideration is a full scale cable stayed pedestrian bridge with composite bridge deck. Data from dynamic testing of the bridge was used to correlate and update the initial model by using FA. The algorithm aimed at minimizing the difference between the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the structure. The performance of the algorithm is analyzed in finding the optimal solution in a multi dimensional search space. The paper concludes with an investigation of the efficacy of the algorithm in obtaining a reference finite element model which correctly represents the as-built original structure.

[1]  Hong Hao,et al.  Civil structure condition assessment by FE model updating: methodology and case studies , 2001 .

[2]  Nicholas A J Lieven,et al.  DYNAMIC FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING USING SIMULATED ANNEALING AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS , 1997 .

[3]  Ning Hu,et al.  Damage assessment of structures using modal test data , 2001 .

[4]  Ricardo Perera,et al.  Structural Damage Detection via Modal Data with Genetic Algorithms , 2006 .

[5]  Mustafa Arafa,et al.  Finite element model updating approach to damage identification in beams using particle swarm optimization , 2013 .

[6]  Kent Gylltoft,et al.  Improved bridge evaluation through finite element model updating using static and dynamic measurements , 2009 .

[7]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Firefly Algorithms for Multimodal Optimization , 2009, SAGA.

[8]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[9]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  Application of ARMAV models to the identification and damage detection of mechanical and civil engineering structures , 2001 .

[10]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory ― Implementation ― Applications , 2011 .

[11]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[12]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Structural Finite Element Model Updating Using Ambient Vibration Test Results , 2005 .

[13]  Arturo González,et al.  A wavelet-based damage detection algorithm based on bridge acceleration response to a vehicle , 2012 .

[14]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Optimization for Engineering Design: Algorithms and Examples , 2004 .

[15]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Baseline finite element modeling of a large span cable-stayed bridge through field ambient vibration tests , 2005 .

[16]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  AMBIENT VIBRATION OF LONG-SPAN CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE , 2001 .

[17]  Olof Friberg,et al.  Updating Large Finite Element Models in Structural Dynamics , 1998 .

[18]  Magdi A. Khalifa,et al.  Importance of Cable Vibration in Dynamics of Cable-Stayed Bridges , 1991 .