Operations and support (O&S) costs for human spaceflight have not received the same attention in the cost estimating community as have development costs. This is unfortunate as O&S costs typically comprise a majority of life-cycle costs (LCC) in such programs as the International Space Station (ISS) and the now-cancelled Constellation Program. Recognizing this, the Constellation Program and NASA HQs supported the development of an O&S cost model specifically for human spaceflight. This model, known as the Exploration Architectures Operations Cost Model (ExAOCM), provided the operations cost estimates for a variety of alternative human missions to the moon, Mars, and Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) in architectural studies. ExAOCM is philosophically based on the DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) concepts of operational nodes, systems, operational functions, and milestones. This paper presents some of the historical background surrounding the development of the model, and discusses the underlying structure, its unusual user interface, and lastly, previous examples of its use in the aforementioned architectural studies.
[1]
S. Hoffman,et al.
Human exploration of Mars, Design Reference Architecture 5.0
,
2010,
2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.
[2]
Craig A. Smith,et al.
Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the International Space Station
,
2002
.
[3]
Robert Shishko.
The application of architecture frameworks to modelling exploration operations costs
,
2006
.
[4]
Yvonne Kellogg,et al.
Report by the International Space Station (ISS) Management and Cost Evaluation (IMCE) Task Force
,
2001
.
[5]
Robert Shishko.
Model for Estimating Space Station Operations Costs
,
2004
.