This paper is a subjective view based on 8years of personal experience in teleradiology.We think the results are of interest totelemedicine in general.Telemedicine is a broad field, which can bedefined in different ways. A Japanese defini-tion of 1996 described it as ‘‘… the use of anyelectrical signal to transmit medical informa-tion…’’ [1]. This is a very technical and sim-plistic view. The University of Athens inGreece published a more detailed definition:‘‘… the transfer of electronic medical data(i.e. high resolution images, sounds, livevideo, and patient records) from one locationto another.’’ [2]. A broader definition, whichtakes the entire health care system into ac-count, says: ‘‘… the use of telecommunica-tions technology to deliver health careservices and health professions education tosites that are distant to the host site or educa-tor…’’ [3].The driving factors in telemedicine wereinvestigated in a study by Frost and Sullivan[4]. The following reasons were identified fordeveloping and using telemedicine: first, thereis pressure to reduce costs. Centralization,specialization and outsourcing need this tech-nology. Furthermore, there is a need forgreater efficiency in the health care system.Advances in technology help in implementingtelemedicine systems today. The dissemina-tion of international standardization is animportant aspect in implementing systemsthat are interoperable. Examples of suchstandards are DICOM, MEDICOM andHL7. The shift from institution-based care tocitizen- and homecare-centered provision isanother important driver. Increased health-care demands can only be satisfied withtelemedicine. Aging populations need tele-monitoring to cut costs and isolated patientsneed and demand full healthcare services.Physicians are motivated to implementtelemedical applications since they recognizean income potential [4].Telemedicine can help patients, physiciansand other medical staff as well as medicalinstitutions, insurance carriers, politiciansand the medical devices market according tothis study [4].
[1]
Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.
Evaluation of the CHILI Teleradiology Network after 3 years of clinical routine
,
2000,
EuroPACS.
[2]
Marco Eichelberg,et al.
Introduction of Security Features to DICOM: Experiences with Digital Signatures
,
2000,
EuroPACS.
[3]
Barry W. Boehm,et al.
A spiral model of software development and enhancement
,
1986,
Computer.
[4]
H Handels,et al.
KAMEDIN: a telemedicine system for computer supported cooperative work and remote image analysis in radiology.
,
1997,
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.
[5]
U Engelmann,et al.
How to deal with security issues in teleradiology.
,
1997,
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.
[6]
Uwe Engelmann,et al.
Borderless Teleradiology with CHILI
,
1999,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[7]
U Engelmann,et al.
Experiences with the german teleradiology system MEDICUS.
,
1997,
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.
[8]
Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.
Anforderungen an ein Teleradiologiesystem : Erfahrungen aus dem MEDICUS-2-Feldtest : Teleradiologie
,
1997
.
[9]
T D Cradduck,et al.
National electrical manufacturers association
,
1983,
Journal of the A.I.E.E..
[10]
Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.
The Linux-based PACS project at the German Cancer Research Center
,
2000
.
[11]
Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.
OPENNESS IN ( TELE-) RADIOLOGY WORKSTATIONS : THE CHILI ® PLUGIN CONCEPT
,
1998
.