Bacterial Recolonization During Foot Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study of Toe Preparation Techniques

Fifty patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery were randomized into two groups for the purposes of toe preparation. Twenty-four patients underwent a standard preparation which included placing antiseptic between the toes while 26 were additionally cleaned by sliding a gauze swab soaked in topical antiseptic back and forth several times. Povidone iodine followed by chlorhexidine in alcohol was used in both groups. All toes were covered by a sterile glove during surgery unless the toes themselves were to be operated upon. Bacteria were cultured from the toe clefts in 4% of all patients immediately following preoperative disinfection. Significantly fewer patients whose toes had been additionally scrubbed (group 1) showed bacterial recolonization at the end of surgery compared with those undergoing a standard prep (group 2) (7.7% vs 20.8%). We conclude that additional scrubbing of toe clefts prior to surgery reduces the incidence of recolonization of bacteria during the surgical procedure.

[1]  L. Crosby,et al.  Results of Preprocedure and Postprocedure Toe Cultures in Orthopaedic Surgery , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[2]  Y. Asano,et al.  Comparison of bactericidal effects of commonly used antiseptics against pathogens causing nosocomial infections. Part 2. , 1997, Dermatology.

[3]  M. Loeb,et al.  A randomized trial of surgical scrubbing with a brush compared to antiseptic soap alone. , 1997, American journal of infection control.

[4]  O. Hara,et al.  Investigation on the efficacy of povidone-iodine against antiseptic-resistant species. , 1997, Dermatology.

[5]  M. Arita,et al.  Inactivation of human viruses by povidone-iodine in comparison with other antiseptics. , 1997, Dermatology.

[6]  D. Goldmann,et al.  Comparison of 10% povidone-iodine and 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of peripheral intravenous catheter colonization in neonates: a prospective trial. , 1995, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[7]  Y. Asano,et al.  Comparison of bactericidal activities of various disinfectants against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. , 1993, Postgraduate medical journal.

[8]  J. Gordon,et al.  In-vitro evaluation of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. , 1992, The Journal of hospital infection.

[9]  Harkless Lb One of the most feared complications of surgery is infection. , 1992 .

[10]  W. Hodge,et al.  Periungual bacterial flora in the human foot. , 1991, The Journal of foot surgery.

[11]  D. Hugar,et al.  Incidence of postoperative infection in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center. , 1990, The Journal of foot surgery.

[12]  J. Leyden,et al.  Subungual Bacteria of the Hand Contribution to the Glove Juice Test: Efficacy of Antimicrobial Detergents , 1989, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[13]  E. Larson Guideline for use of topical antimicrobial agents. , 1988, American journal of infection control.

[14]  R. Garibaldi Prevention of intraoperative wound contamination with chlorhexidine shower and scrub. , 1988, The Journal of hospital infection.

[15]  A. F. Peterson,et al.  Comparative evaluation of surgical scrub preparations. , 1978, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[16]  N. Senior Some observations on the formulation 'and properties of chlorhexidine , 1973 .