Cross Firm Bank Branch Benchmarking Using "Handicapped" Data Envelopment Analysis to Adjust for Corporate Strategic Effects

In today’s economy and society, performance analyses in the services industries attract more and more attention. However, the traditional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach requires a consistent operating environment that one may deem as the "culture". In reality, there is an especially important situation when the units belong to different organizations and the groups of units can not have the same culture. This reality challenges the traditional methods of applying DEA theory to real-world cases. A new technology was developed that allows efficiency evaluation by benchmarking three different banks’ branches in the city of Mississauga, Canada, using DEA. This new approach overcomes the above limitation by introducing a mathematically handicapped DEA model. Using this development, cultural differences due to corporate management's policies can be adjusted for. Finding a handicapping function which can fairly assess the large Canadian banks’ managerial and business strategy differences was another contribution of this work.

[1]  W. Cook,et al.  Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches , 2000 .

[2]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[4]  M. Oral,et al.  An empirical study on measuring operating efficiency and profitability of bank branches , 1990 .

[5]  D. Hancock The Financial Firm: Production with Monetary and Nonmonetary Goods , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Commercial branch performance evaluation and results communication in a Canadian bank--a DEA application , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Boaz Golany,et al.  A Data Envelopment Analysis of the Operational Efficiency of Bank Branches , 1999, Interfaces.

[8]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions , 2002 .

[9]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1986 .

[10]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  The Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in Banking Institutions: Evidence from the Commercial Bank of Greece , 2000, Interfaces.

[11]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[12]  R. G. Dyson,et al.  Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: a DEA application to bank branch assessments , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  H. Sherman,et al.  Managing Bank Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis DEA , 1995 .

[15]  John C.S. Tang,et al.  The evaluation of bank branch performance using data envelopment analysis: A framework , 2002 .

[16]  Celik Parkan Measuring the efficiency of service operations: An application to bank branches , 1987 .

[17]  W. Greene,et al.  Application of Panel Data Models in Benchmarking Analysis of the Electricity Distribution Sector , 2006 .

[18]  J. Paradi,et al.  Best practice analysis of bank branches: An application of DEA in a large Canadian bank , 1997 .

[19]  Dennis Fixler,et al.  An index number approach to measuring bank efficiency: An application to mergers , 1993 .