Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured

AbstractOBJECTIVE: A frequently cited obstacle to universal insurance is the lack of consensus about what benefits to offer in an affordable insurance package. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility of providing uninsured patients the opportunity to define their own benefit package within cost constraints. DESIGN: Structured group exercises SETTING: Community setting PARTICIPANTS: Uninsured individuals recruited from clinical and community settings in central North Carolina. MEASUREMENTS: Insurance choices were measured using a simulation exercise, CHAT (Choosing Healthplans All Together). Participants designed managed care plans, individually and as groups, by selecting from 15 service categories having varied levels of restriction (e.g., formulary, copayments) within the constraints of a fixed monthly premium comparable to the typical per member/per month managed care premium paid by U.S. employers. MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-four individuals who were predominantly male (70%), African American (55%), and socioeconomically disadvantaged (53% earned <$15,000 annually) participated in 22 groups and were able to design health benefit packages individually and in groups. All 22 groups chose to cover hospitalization, pharmacy, dental, and specialty care, and 21 groups chose primary care and mental health. Although individuals’ choices differed from their groups’ selections, 86% of participants were willing to abide by group choices. CONCLUSIONS: Groups of low-income uninsured individuals are able to identify acceptable benefit packages that are comparable in cost but differ in benefit design from managed care contracts offered to many U.S. employees today.

[1]  C. Kahn,et al.  Building a consensus for expanding health coverage. , 2001, Health affairs.

[2]  R. Kuttner.  THE AMERICAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM : HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE , 1999 .

[3]  L. Fleck,et al.  Just caring: health reform and health care rationing. , 1994, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[4]  B. Druss,et al.  The Evolution of Mental Health Parity in American Politics , 2000, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[5]  L. Jacobs,et al.  The Oregon Health Plan and the political paradox of rationing: what advocates and critics have claimed and what Oregon did. , 1999, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[6]  R. Busse.  Priority-setting and rationing in German health care. , 1999, Health policy.

[7]  Richard D. Duke,et al.  Principles and practices of gaming-simulation , 1981 .

[8]  JoAnn E. Manson,et al.  Women’s health care: One size does not fit all , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  E. Hoy,et al.  A guide to facilitating consumer choice. , 1996, Health affairs.

[10]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice , 1995, BMJ.

[11]  K. Grumbach.  Insuring the uninsured: time to end the aura of invisibility. , 2000, JAMA.

[12]  M. Pauly,et al.  Expanding coverage via tax credits: trade-offs and outcomes. , 2001, Health affairs.

[13]  K. Davis,et al.  A 2020 vision for American health care. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  F. J. Fowler,et al.  Measuring Public Priorities for Insurable Health Care , 1994, Medical care.

[15]  S. Berki,et al.  HMO enrollment: who joins what and why: a review of the literature. , 1980, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society.

[16]  D. Blumenthal.  Controlling health care expenditures. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J. Lomas,et al.  Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[18]  J. Lenaghan,et al.  Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizens juries. , 1999, Health policy.

[19]  L. Southgate,et al.  Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  Factors affecting choice of health care plans. , 1986, Health services research.

[21]  L. Bergthold.  Perspectives: Benefit Design Choices Under Managed Competition , 1993 .

[22]  P. Fronstin.  Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 1999 Current Population Survey , 2000, EBRI issue brief.

[23]  Q. Mcnemar.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages , 1947, Psychometrika.

[24]  Nathan Mantel,et al.  Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom , 1963 .

[25]  P. Cooper,et al.  Assessing the impact of health plan choice. , 2001, Health affairs.

[26]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  D. Satcher.  Mental Health: A Report of the Surgen General , 1999 .

[28]  D. Rowland,et al.  Covering the low-income uninsured: the case for expanding public programs. , 2001, Health affairs.

[29]  D. Mechanic,et al.  Choosing among health insurance options: a study of new employees. , 1990, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.