Time‐to‐event analysis with treatment arm selection at interim

This paper discusses the application of an adaptive design for treatment arm selection in an oncology trial, with survival as the primary endpoint and disease progression as a key secondary endpoint. We carried out treatment arm selection at an interim analysis by using Bayesian predictive power combining evidence from the two endpoints. At the final analysis, we carried out a frequentist statistical test of efficacy on the survival endpoint. We investigated several approaches (Bonferroni approach, 'Dunnett-like' approach, a conditional error function approach and a combination p-value approach) with respect to their power and the precise conditions under which type I error control is attained.

[1]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[2]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[3]  Weichung J Shih,et al.  Two-Stage Adaptive Design for Clinical Trials with Survival Data , 2005, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[4]  Antje Jahn-Eimermacher,et al.  Adaptive trial design: a general methodology for censored time to event data. , 2009, Contemporary clinical trials.

[5]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  S. Pocock,et al.  Integrating indacaterol dose selection in a clinical study in COPD using an adaptive seamless design. , 2009, Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[7]  Mary W Redman,et al.  Disease control rate at 8 weeks predicts clinical benefit in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from Southwest Oncology Group randomized trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation: Spiegelhalter/Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation , 2004 .

[9]  P. Bauer,et al.  Adaptive Two Stage Designs and the Conditional Error Function , 1999 .

[10]  Nigel Stallard,et al.  Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Adaptive Dunnett tests for treatment selection , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  P. Bauer,et al.  Modification of the sample size and the schedule of interim analyses in survival trials based on data inspections by H. Schäfer and H.‐H. Müller, Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20: 3741–3751 , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  W. Lehmacher,et al.  Adaptive Sample Size Calculations in Group Sequential Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[14]  Tim Friede,et al.  A group‐sequential design for clinical trials with treatment selection , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Allan R Sampson,et al.  Drop‐the‐Losers Design: Normal Case , 2005, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[16]  George Iliopoulos,et al.  Estimation of parametric functions in Downton's bivariate exponential distribution , 2003 .