Digital Existence - the Modern Way to Be

This is an interpretative viewpoint blending perspectives to form a composite view of digital existence. The paper uses philosophy, sociology and linguistics within an ethnographic framework of contrasting cultural and cultural artefact views. Digital being and the relationship between physical and virtual are discussed. Evidence suggests acceptance of the virtual world as a location of coexistence. How technology has merged with humans so that humans have become more than their organic selves is examined. In a virtual world, digital existence is achieved through Daseinian avatars and so the concept of self is explored. There then follows a broader discussion about the online world which leads into how these new technologies become accepted by individuals and society. The influence of mass media is considered in this context. This is followed by a short analysis of the vocabulary used to describe the online world. The paper ends with a call to rethink how to view and react to the online world. Existing positions are challenged as being inappropriate given the analysis undertaken.

[1]  M. Castells.  Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1996 .

[2]  Joseph Luca,et al.  The impact of digital persona on the future of learning: A case study on digital repositories and the sharing of information about children at risk in Western Australia , 2005 .

[3]  Jessica Wolfendale,et al.  My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment , 2007, Ethics and Information Technology.

[4]  Alessandro Tomasi,et al.  The Role of Intimacy in the Evolution of Technology , 2008 .

[5]  Peter Nagy,et al.  “My Avatar and Her Beloved Possession”: Characteristics of Attachment to Virtual Objects , 2014 .

[6]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web , 2008, CACM.

[7]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Trust and temporary virtual teams: alternative explanations and dramaturgical relationships , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[8]  S. Lanfranco.  The citizen, the expert and wisdom in the virtual workspace , 1995, Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory.

[9]  Luca Faust.  Teaching About Technology An Introduction To The Philosophy Of Technology For Non Philosophers , 2016 .

[10]  Kim Smith,et al.  Cybermourning Frames and Collective Memory: Remembering Comedian Robin Williams on Legacy.com , 2015 .

[11]  Denis L. Jamet.  What do Internet metaphors reveal about the perception of the Internet ? , 2010 .

[12]  Guang-chun Ge,et al.  A corpus-based lexical study on frequency and distribution of Coxhead’s AWL word families in medical research articles (RAs)☆ , 2007 .

[13]  Jeremy Harris Lipschultz,et al.  Mass Media, an Aging Population, and the Baby Boomers , 2005 .

[14]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[15]  Joohan Kim,et al.  Phenomenology of Digital-Being , 2001 .

[16]  Steven Crowell.  Subjectivity: Locating the First-Person in Being and Time , 2001 .

[17]  Philip A.E. Brey.  Technology and Embodiment in Ihde and Merleay-Ponty. , 2000 .

[18]  Roy Want,et al.  You Are Your Cell Phone , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[19]  Mark Balnaves,et al.  Protecting the Digital Citizen: the impact of digital personae on ideas of universal access to knowledge and community , 2006 .

[20]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Revisiting the nature of virtual organizations: reflections on mobile communication systems , 2001 .

[21]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence , 2008 .