Practice effect and normative data of an HIV-specific neuropsychological testing battery among healthy Thais.

OBJECTIVE A longitudinal cohort study was conducted in Bangkok, Thailand between 2008 and 2013 in order to determine the practice effect of serial neuropsychological testing and establish normative data among normal (HIV-uninfected) Thai volunteers. MATERIAL AND METHOD The authors enrolled 511 cognitively healthy individuals (HIV-uninfected, no drug abuse or other previous/current neurological or psychological conditions) to assess baseline performance on a HIV-specific neuropsychological testing battery. Ninety-nine subjects were re-assessed at 6 and 12 months to evaluate practice effects. RESULTS The mean age of the 99 subjects completing longitudinal visits was 49.2 years and 53 were male. The authors identified improved mean raw scores on most neuropsychological tests with repeated measurements; however only change in WHO Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) scores (learning, attention, immediate and delayed recall tasks) met statistical significance, with larger differences seen between baseline and 6-month compared to 6 and 12 months follow-up. Older age correlated with poorer baseline raw score, and was a predictor of worse performance at 6 months and 12 months on several tasks. Level of education was associated with practice effects on several tests. No similar effects were observed with gender. CONCLUSION The authors identified improved performance after repeated measurements revealing a significant practice effect on an HIV-specific neuropsychological testing battery employed in Bangkok, Thailand. Main predictors were age and educational attainment.

[1]  H. Ehrenreich,et al.  Practice effects in healthy adults: A longitudinal study on frequent repetitive cognitive testing , 2010, BMC Neuroscience.

[2]  Paul Maruff,et al.  The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals. , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS.

[3]  B. Axelrod,et al.  Practice Effects on the WAIS-III Across 3- and 6-Month Intervals , 2002, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[4]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Practice effects on commonly used measures of executive function across twelve months. , 1999, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[5]  I. Grant,et al.  Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: A comparison of four models , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[6]  I. Grant,et al.  Test–retest reliability and practice effects of Expanded Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[7]  L. Harrell,et al.  A method for assessing clinically relevant individual cognitive change in older adult populations. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[8]  R. Benedict,et al.  Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[9]  Brian F. Johnson,et al.  Variability in psychometric test scores: The importance of the practice effect in patient study design , 1991, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[10]  I. Grant,et al.  A battery approach for measuring neuropsychological change. , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[11]  M. Maj,et al.  WHO Neuropsychiatric AIDS study, cross-sectional phase II. Neuropsychological and neurological findings. , 1994, Archives of general psychiatry.