An Integrated Decision Support Toolbox (DST) for the Management of Mountain Protected Areas

Abstract New tools and methodologies are required in systemic planning and management of mountain protected areas. Among others we propose here a decision support toolbox (DST) conceived as an integrated collection of both soft and hard system methodologies, consisting of participatory and computer-based modules to provide a set of integrated, self-contained tools and approaches to support decision-making processes in the management of mountain protected areas. The Sagarmatha National Park and Buffer Zone (SNPBZ) in Nepal was taken as a pilot case. A number of participatory exercises such as participatory 3-dimensional modeling, scenario planning, and qualitative modeling were carried out to understand social-ecological processes and generate a systemic view over space and time. The qualitative models were then converted into computer-based system dynamics models. The design and development of DST software were carried out with an incremental and modular approach. This process involved stakeholder analysis and decision-making processes through a series of consultations. The software was developed with the main modules including scenario analysis, spatial analysis, and knowledge base. The scenario analysis module runs system dynamics models built in Simile software and provides functions to link them with spatial data for model inputs and outputs. The spatial analysis module provides the basic geographic information system functions to explore, edit, analyze, and visualize spatial information. The knowledge base module was developed as a metadata management system for different categories of information such as spatial data, bibliography, research data, and models. The development of DST software, especially system dynamics modeling and its linkage with spatial components, provided an important methodological approach for spatial and temporal integration. Furthermore, training and interactions with park managers and concerned stakeholders showed that DST is a useful platform for integrating data and information and better understanding ecosystem behavior as a basis for management decisions.

[1]  Robert Muetzelfeldt,et al.  The Simile visual modelling environment , 2003 .

[2]  S Lane,et al.  Designing for the future. , 1993, The Journal of nursing administration.

[3]  F. de Zeeuw,et al.  Designing the Future , 2010 .

[4]  Robert Muetzelfeldt,et al.  Concept Maps for Combining Hard and Soft System Thinking in the Management of Socio-Ecosystem , 2008 .

[5]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR , 1994 .

[6]  Keith M. Reynolds,et al.  2 9 Decision Support for Sustainable Forestry: Enhancing the Basic Rational Model , 2007 .

[7]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[8]  S. Chape,et al.  Protected areas and biodiversity : an overview of key issues , 2004 .

[9]  Keith M. Reynolds,et al.  Sustainable Forestry: From Monitoring and Modelling to Knowledge Management and Policy Science , 2007 .

[10]  Giuseppe Daconto,et al.  Applying Scenario Planning to Park and Tourism Management in Sagarmatha National Park, Khumbu, Nepal , 2010 .

[11]  Mark J. Twery,et al.  Decision support systems for ecosystem management: An evaluation of existing systems , 1997 .

[12]  C. S. Holling Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems , 2001, Ecosystems.

[13]  François Bousquet,et al.  Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review , 2004 .

[14]  Stanley A. Morain,et al.  GIS solutions in natural resource management : balancing the technical-political equation , 1999 .

[15]  Steen Leleur Systemic Planning: Principles and Methodology for Planning in a Complex World , 2005 .

[16]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[17]  W. Utah,et al.  Conservation planning and assessment of irreplaceability and vulnerability of conservation sites in the 'Heart of the West' region, Middle Rockies , 2006 .

[18]  H. Michael,et al.  AN AGENT ARCHITECTURE FOR AN INTEGRATED FOREST ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM , 2003 .

[19]  Michael Batty,et al.  GIS, spatial analysis, and modeling , 2005 .