Understanding the Diversity of User Requirements for Interactive Online Health Services

The purpose of the study presented in this paper is to develop our understanding of the diversity of user requirements for interactive online health services in order to inform improvements to their design leading to better health outcomes. Data collected in Australia was analysed following the established but unfamiliar regime of Q methodology that enables the subjectivities of a diverse set of respondents to be studied systematically. This analysis produced three significant groupings of respondents referred to as: 'service-oriented users', 'collaborative interactive users' and 'health information seekers'. Among these groups we identify and discuss a range of elements indicative of the variety of users' experiences and subjective views on the content, design, functionality and usability of systems for the development of effective interactive online health service provision.

[1]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  Shortcomings of health information on the Internet. , 2003, Health promotion international.

[2]  Yuquan Shi,et al.  The accessibility of Chinese local government Web sites: An exploratory study , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Collaborative articulation in healthcare settings: towards increased visibility, negotiation and mutual understanding , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[4]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[5]  Trevor M. Y. Kwok,et al.  Social Features in Online Communities for Healthcare Consumers - A Review , 2009, HCI.

[6]  Steven R. Brown.  Q Technique and Questionnaires , 2002, Operant Subjectivity.

[7]  David K. Ahern,et al.  What Is e-Health : Perspectives on the Evolution of e-Health Research , 2006 .

[8]  Jacqueline A. Pugh,et al.  The influence of electronic medical record usage on nonverbal communication in the medical interview , 2007, Health Informatics J..

[9]  J. Gilmour,et al.  Reducing disparities in the access and use of Internet health information. a discussion paper. , 2007, International journal of nursing studies.

[10]  Krzysztof Zielinski,et al.  Information Technology Solutions for Healthcare , 2005 .

[11]  Cynthia LeRouge,et al.  Back to the future of IT adoption and evaluation in healthcare , 2011 .

[12]  David Bomba,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Health Web Sites: Developing a Validation Method and Rating Instrument , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Steven R. Brown.  A Primer on Q Methodology , 1993, Operant Subjectivity.

[14]  John W. Hill,et al.  The national healthcare crisis: Is eHealth a key solution? , 2009 .

[15]  Diana J. Mason,et al.  Promoting Health Literacy , 2001 .

[16]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Peter A. Bath,et al.  Health informatics: current issues and challenges , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Russell Mannion,et al.  Q methodology in health economics , 2006, Journal of health services research & policy.

[19]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Older people and internet engagement: Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[20]  Elsevier Sdol.  International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 2009 .

[21]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[22]  S. Wyatt,et al.  'Ignorance is bliss sometimes': constraints on the emergence of the 'informed patient' in the changing landscapes of health information. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[23]  John P. Glaser,et al.  The Strategic Application of Information Technology in Health Care Organizations , 2011 .

[24]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Dohoon Kim,et al.  Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance model , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  Kim M. Nazi.  The Journey to e-Health: VA Healthcare Network Upstate New York (VISN 2) , 2004, Journal of Medical Systems.

[27]  W. Stephenson.  CORRELATING PERSONS INSTEAD OF TESTS , 1935 .

[28]  Manolis Tsiknakis,et al.  Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: A case study employing the FITT framework , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  Bruce McKeown,et al.  The Forced-Free Distinction in Q Technique: A Note on Unused Categories in the Q Sort Continuum , 1980, Operant Subjectivity.

[30]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  Rethinking Communication in the E-health Era , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[31]  W. Stephenson.  The study of behavior : Q-technique and its methodology , 1955 .

[32]  M. Ellis,et al.  Consumer health information on the WWW: an evaluation of information on verrucae , 2003 .

[33]  Steven R. Brown.  The Importance of Factors in Q Methodology: Statistical and Theoretical Considerations , 1978, Operant Subjectivity.

[34]  M. Pérez,et al.  Accessing Web-Based Health Related Information by College Students: An Exploratory Study , 2006 .

[35]  Pierre Chauvin,et al.  Health information seeking on the Internet: a double divide? Results from a representative survey in the Paris metropolitan area, France, 2005–2006 , 2008, BMC public health.

[36]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.

[37]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[38]  M. C. Gibbons.  A Historical Overview of Health Disparities and the Potential of eHealth Solutions , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  E. Bruera,et al.  Palliative Cancer Patients and Their Families on the Internet: Motivation and Impact , 2000, Journal of palliative care.

[40]  Peter A Bath,et al.  Understanding the information behaviours of carers of people with dementia: A critical review of models from information science , 2008, Aging & mental health.

[41]  Mari Ervasti,et al.  Understanding human values in adopting new technology - A case study and methodological discussion , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[42]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Knowledge to action? The implications for policy and practice research on innovation processes in organisational behaviour in health care , 2008 .

[43]  Elizabeth Harrin.  Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users , 2008, Comput. J..

[44]  Nelly E.J. Oudshoorn,et al.  Telecare Technologies and the Transformation of Healthcare , 2011 .