A novel imaging technique for fusion of high-quality immobilised MR images of the head and neck with CT scans for radiotherapy target delineation.

Uncertainty and inconsistency are observed in target volume delineation in the head and neck for radiotherapy treatment planning based only on CT imaging. Alternative modalities such as MRI have previously been incorporated into the delineation process to provide additional anatomical information. This work aims to improve on previous studies by combining good image quality with precise patient immobilisation in order to maintain patient position between scans. MR images were acquired using quadrature coils placed over the head and neck while the patient was immobilised in the treatment position using a five-point thermoplastic shell. The MR image and CT images were automatically fused in the Pinnacle treatment planning system using Syntegra software. Image quality, distortion and accuracy of the image registration using patient anatomy were evaluated. Image quality was found to be superior to that acquired using the body coil, while distortion was < 1.0 mm to a radius of 8.7 cm from the scan centre. Image registration accuracy was found to be 2.2 mm (+/- 0.9 mm) and < 3.0 degrees (n = 6). A novel MRI technique that combines good image quality with patient immobilization has been developed and is now in clinical use. The scan duration of approximately 15 min has been well tolerated by all patients.

[1]  W. Tomé,et al.  Variations in target delineation for head and neck IMRT: An international multi-institutional study , 2004 .

[2]  Deming Wang,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  E Bellon,et al.  Interobserver variations in gross tumor volume delineation of brain tumors on computed tomography and impact of magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  R. Hicks,et al.  Where do we draw the line? Contouring tumors on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Jean-François Daisne,et al.  Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  L. Ting,et al.  Impact of magnetic resonance imaging versus CT on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: primary tumor target delineation for radiotherapy , 2004, Head & neck.

[7]  P. Levine,et al.  Gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of tumors of the head and neck , 1990, Head & neck.

[8]  Alessandro Carriero,et al.  Acceptance Test of a Commercially Available Software for Automatic Image Registration of Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) And 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Brain Images , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Deming Wang,et al.  A proposed scheme for comprehensive characterization of the measured geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging using a three-dimensional phantom. , 2004, Medical physics.

[10]  Martin O Leach,et al.  A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  A. Weber,et al.  Malignant tumors of the oral cavity and oropharynx: clinical, pathologic, and radiologic evaluation. , 2003, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[12]  Anil Sethi,et al.  Influence of MRI on target volume delineation and IMRT planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  David M. Doddrell,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  Andrew W. Beavis,et al.  Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers , 2004, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  The potential impact of CT-MRI matching on tumor volume delineation in advanced head and neck cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  R. Tien,et al.  Correlation of clinical, surgical, pathologic, and MR fat suppression results for head and neck cancer , 1992, Head & neck.