Real-Time Circuit Pressures Correlate Poorly with Circuit Longevity in Anticoagulant-Free, Predilution Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration

Background: Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in renal failure is compromised by circuit clotting. We hypothesized that adverse circuit pressures are predictive of clotting in circuits that last less than 24 h during predilution, anticoagulant-free CVVH. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of 63 CVVH circuits of 13 critically ill intensive care unit patients with severe renal failure. Circuits were categorized into ‘clotters’ (C) or ‘nonclotters’ (NC), if spontaneous clotting occurred at <24 or ≧24 h from the start of CVVH, respectively. Results: Effluent pressures and pre-filter pressures were more adverse in NC compared to C starting from 6 and 4 h before spontaneous clotting, respectively. Arterial pressures and return pressures were not significantly different in C versus NC. Blood flow rate settings, hemofiltration fluid replacement and effluent drainage rates in C versus NC were comparable. Conclusion: Real-time circuit pressure readings seem to offer only potentially limited prognostic value in predicting circuit clotting.

[1]  C. Becchi,et al.  Regional anticoagulation and antiaggregation for CVVH in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study , 2010, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Nursing for Renal Replacement Therapies in the Intensive Care Unit: Historical, Educational, and Protocol Review , 2009, Blood Purification.

[3]  H. O. Oudemans-van Straaten,et al.  Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy , 2007, Critical care.

[4]  I. Baldwin Factors affecting circuit patency and filter 'life'. , 2007, Contributions to nephrology.

[5]  A. Ejaz,et al.  Extracorporeal circuit pressure profiles during continuous venovenous haemofiltration. , 2007, Nursing in critical care.

[6]  R. Rossaint,et al.  Relation of haemofilter type to venous catheter resistance is crucial for filtration performance and haemocompatibility in CVVH--an in vitro study. , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[7]  G. Colucci,et al.  Does Monitoring of Pre-/Post-Dialyzer Pressure Difference Improve Efficiency in Intermittent Hemodialysis? , 2003, Blood Purification.

[8]  N Fealy,et al.  The effect of circuit "down-time" on uraemic control during continuous veno-venous haemofiltration. , 2002, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.

[9]  R. Bellomo,et al.  POSSIBLE STRATEGIES TO PROLONG CIRCUIT LIFE DURING HEMOFILTRATION: THREE CONTROLLED STUDIES , 2002, Renal failure.

[10]  M. Schetz Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy , 2001, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[11]  J. Niles,et al.  Anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy. , 1999, Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension.

[12]  M. Zimpfer,et al.  Anticoagulation with prostaglandin E1 and unfractionated heparin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration. , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[13]  A. Bersten,et al.  Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: Monitoring Circuit Function , 1996, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[14]  Elder Td,et al.  Continuous hemofiltration: nursing perspectives in critical care. , 1995 .

[15]  R. Bellomo,et al.  The Effect of Circuit “ DownTime ” on Uraemic Control During Continuous Veno-Venous , 2004 .

[16]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Continuous hemofiltration: nursing perspectives in critical care. , 1995, New horizons.