A Multivariate Test Battery for Predicting Vigilance

It has proved difficult to predict individual differences in vigilance from standard psychometric tests. We report a study that explored the utility of a multivariate battery in predicting vigilance on a task requiring monitoring of a tactical display. A two-phase design was employed. Participants performed a short vigilance task (SVT) prior to the longer criterion monitoring task. We investigated the predictive ability of cognitive ability, personality, performance on the SVT, and stress responses to the SVT. Four versions of the criterion task were used, to test generalization of predictive validity. Key predictors of vigilance were found to include ability, SVT performance, and subjective task engagement and coping. Multiple regression analyses suggested that together these predictors explained about 30% of the variance in vigilance (with some differences for prediction of different task versions). Results are discussed in relation to the resource theory of vigilance, and the practical issues arising from selecting vigilant operators.

[1]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  Stress state mediation between environmental variables and performance: the case of noise and vigilance. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Measuring Vigilance Abilities to Enhance Combat Identification Performance , 2009 .

[3]  H. Harman,et al.  Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[4]  Tyler H. Shaw,et al.  Predicting vigilance: A fresh look at an old problem , 2009, Ergonomics.

[5]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  Task-Induced Stress and Individual Differences in Coping , 1998 .

[6]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Working Memory and Intelligence : The Same or Different Constructs ? , 2005 .

[7]  D. Washburn,et al.  Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Effects of Signal Salience and Caffeine on Performance, Workload, and Stress in an Abbreviated Vigilance Task , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Tyler H. Shaw,et al.  Individual differences in vigilance: Personality, ability and states of stress , 2010 .

[10]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[11]  M. Loeb,et al.  The Psychology of Vigilance , 1982 .

[12]  K. Schweizer The Relationship of Attention and Intelligence , 2010 .

[13]  Rebecca A. Grier,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry. , 2002, Emotion.

[14]  James L. Szalma,et al.  Effects of Sensory Modality and Task Duration on Performance, Workload, and Stress in Sustained Attention , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[15]  J. Warm,et al.  Task Engagement, Attention, and Executive Control , 2010 .

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.