Heterozygote advantage fails to explain the high degree of polymorphism of the MHC

Major histocompatibility (MHC) molecules are encoded by extremely polymorphic genes and play a crucial role in vertebrate immunity. Natural selection favors MHC heterozygous hosts because individuals heterozygous at the MHC can present a larger diversity of peptides from infectious pathogens than homozygous individuals. Whether or not heterozygote advantage is sufficient to account for a high degree of polymorphism is controversial, however. Using mathematical models we studied the degree of MHC polymorphism arising when heterozygote advantage is the only selection pressure. We argue that existing models are misleading in that the fitness of heterozygotes is not related to the MHC alleles they harbor. To correct for this, we have developed novel models in which the genotypic fitness of a host directly reflects the fitness contributions of its MHC alleles. The mathematical analysis suggests that a high degree of polymorphism can only be accounted for if the different MHC alleles confer unrealistically similar fitnesses. This conclusion was confirmed by stochastic simulations, including mutation, genetic drift, and a finite population size. Heterozygote advantage on its own is insufficient to explain the high population diversity of the MHC.

[1]  M. Nei,et al.  Allelic genealogy under overdominant and frequency-dependent selection and polymorphism of major histocompatibility complex loci. , 1990, Genetics.

[2]  Rob J. De Boer,et al.  MHC polymorphism under host-pathogen coevolution , 2004, Immunogenetics.

[3]  P. Parham,et al.  Diversity of class I HLA molecules: functional and evolutionary interactions with T cells. , 1989, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[4]  T. Ohta,et al.  Population Biology of Antigen Presentation by MHC Class I Molecules , 1996, Science.

[5]  A Sette,et al.  Role of HLA-A motifs in identification of potential CTL epitopes in human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 proteins. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[6]  M. Nei,et al.  Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection , 1988, Nature.

[7]  J. Klein,et al.  Polymorphism and balancing selection at major histocompatibility complex loci. , 1992, Genetics.

[8]  F. Weissing,et al.  Competition at the mouse t complex: rare alleles are inherently favored. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  J. Goedert,et al.  HLA and HIV-1: heterozygote advantage and B*35-Cw*04 disadvantage. , 1999, Science.

[10]  H. Rammensee,et al.  HLA-A2 subtypes are functionally distinct in peptide binding and presentation , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[11]  W. Amos,et al.  Inbreeding: Disease susceptibility in California sea lions , 2003, Nature.

[12]  Andrew J. McMichael,et al.  Common West African HLA antigens are associated with protection from severe malaria , 1991, Nature.

[13]  M. Milinski,et al.  Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism , 2001, Nature.

[14]  A. Hughes,et al.  Natural selection at major histocompatibility complex loci of vertebrates. , 1998, Annual review of genetics.

[15]  D. Watkins,et al.  Major histocompatibility complex class I genes in primates: co‐evolution with pathogens , 1999, Immunological reviews.

[16]  M. Nei,et al.  Models of host-parasite interaction and MHC polymorphism. , 1992, Genetics.

[17]  W. Potts,et al.  MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Konrad Beck.  Coevolution: Mathematical analysis of host-parasite interactions , 1984, Journal of mathematical biology.

[19]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Do infectious diseases drive MHC diversity? , 2000, Microbes and infection.

[20]  I P Keet,et al.  Associations between HLA frequencies and pathogenic features of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in seroconverters from the Amsterdam cohort of homosexual men. , 1994, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[21]  T. Nagylaki.  Introduction to Theoretical Population Genetics , 1992 .

[22]  G. Snell.  The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism. , 1968, Folia biologica.

[23]  A. Hill,et al.  Naturally processed peptides from two disease-resistance-associated HLA-DR13 alleles show related sequence motifs and the effects of the dimorphism at position 86 of the HLA-DR beta chain. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  H. Rammensee,et al.  SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs , 1999, Immunogenetics.

[25]  A. Lloyd,et al.  The Influence of HLA Class I Alleles and Heterozygosity on the Outcome of Human T Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type I Infection1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[26]  P. Parham,et al.  Diversity and diversification of HLA-A,B,C alleles. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[27]  M. Nei,et al.  Genetic variability maintained by mutation and overdominant selection in finite populations. , 1981, Genetics.

[28]  R. Slade,et al.  Overdominant vs. frequency-dependent selection at MHC loci. , 1992, Genetics.

[29]  Edward K. Wakeland,et al.  Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype , 1991, Nature.

[30]  PATHOGEN RESISTANCE AND GENETIC VARIATION AT MHC LOCI , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  S. Kuhara,et al.  Differences in MHC class I self peptide repertoires among HLA-A2 subtypes. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[32]  J J van Rood,et al.  HLA segregation of tuberculoid leprosy: confirmation of the DR2 marker. , 1980, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[33]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice heterozygous at the H-2 gene complex , 1975, Nature.

[34]  F. Weissing,et al.  Selection and segregation distortion in a sex-differentiated population. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[35]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism. , 1978, Genetics.

[36]  W. Bodmer,et al.  Evolutionary Significance of the HL-A System , 1972, Nature.

[37]  M. Nei,et al.  Nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class II loci: evidence for overdominant selection. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.