From semantics to syntax and back again: Argument structure in the third year of life

An essential part of the human capacity for language is the ability to link conceptual or semantic representations with syntactic representations. On the basis of data from spontaneous production, suggested that young children acquire such links on a verb-by-verb basis, with little in the way of a general understanding of linguistic argument structure. Here, we suggest that a receptive understanding of argument structure--including principles linking syntax and conceptual/semantic structure--appears earlier. In a forced-choice pointing task we have shown that toddlers in the third year of life can map a single scene (involving a novel causative action paired with a novel verb) onto two distinct syntactic frames (transitive and intransitive). This suggests that even before toddlers begin generalizing argument structure in their own speech, they have some representation of conceptual/semantic categories, syntactic categories, and a system that links the two.

[1]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Acquiring the transitive construction in English: the role of animacy and pronouns , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[2]  Jane B. Childers,et al.  The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[3]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Training 2;6-year-olds to produce the transitive construction: the role of frequency, semantic similarity and shared syntactic distribution. , 2004, Developmental science.

[4]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted:the role of information structure in argument distribution , 2001 .

[5]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[6]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Twenty-Five-Month-Old Children Do Not Have a Grammatical Category of Verb. , 1993 .

[7]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[8]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  A.H.J. Do,et al.  Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2002 .

[10]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The Origins of Grammar , 1996 .

[11]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure , 1991, Cognition.

[12]  Edith L. Bavin,et al.  Infants of 24-30 Months Understand Verb Frames , 2000 .

[13]  J. Pine,et al.  Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category , 1998 .

[14]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[15]  S. Pinker Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[16]  E. Markman,et al.  When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth , 1994 .

[17]  M. Tomasello,et al.  A tale of two theories: response to Fisher , 2002, Cognition.

[18]  B. Levin Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[19]  Cynthia L Fisher,et al.  Structural limits on verb mapping: the role of abstract structure in 2.5‐year‐olds’ interpretations of novel verbs , 2002 .

[20]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Differential productivity in young children's use of nouns and verbs , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[21]  N. Akhtar Acquiring basic word order: evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure , 1999, Journal of Child Language.