18F-FDG Uptake During Early Adjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Histologic Response in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Osteosarcoma

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of 18F-FDG uptake in the primary tumor at diagnosis, during therapy, and after therapy with a histologic response and event-free survival in pediatric and young adult patients with osteosarcoma (OS). Methods: Serial (baseline and 5 and 10 wk after start of therapy) 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed in patients with newly diagnosed OS treated uniformly in a therapeutic trial at a single institution. Whole-body images were obtained approximately 1 h after injection of 18F-FDG. Logistic regression was used to study the association of tumor uptake and changes in SUVmax between 0, 5, and 10 wk for both clinical endpoints. Results: Thirty-four patients (17 males; median age, 12.2 y; age range, 6.8–19.1 y) underwent PET imaging; 25 (74%) had localized disease. Primary tumor locations included the femur (n = 17; 50%), tibia (n = 9; 26%), and humerus (n = 5; 15%). Logistic regression showed that SUVmax at 5 wk (P = 0.034) and 10 wk (P = 0.022) and percentage change from baseline at 10 wk (P = 0.021) were highly predictive of a histologic response. Using SUVmax of 4.04 at week 5, SUVmax of 3.15 at week 10, and 60% decrease from baseline at week 10 as cutoff values, we determined that the respective sensitivities were 0.93, 0.93, and 0.79 and that the respective specificities were 0.53, 0.71, and 0.76. Conclusion: SUVmax on routine images at 5 or 10 wk and percentage change in SUVmax from baseline to week 10 were metabolic predictors of a histologic response in OS. These findings may be useful in the early identification of patients who are responding poorly to therapy and may benefit from a change in treatment.

[1]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Assessment of Imaging Modalities and Response Metrics in Ewing Sarcoma: Correlation With Survival. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  James R. Anderson,et al.  18F 2Fluoro-2deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) response to predict event-free survival (EFS) in intermediate risk (IR) or high risk (HR) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS): A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group (COG). , 2016 .

[3]  D. Jeon,et al.  Initial Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT Can Predict the Outcome of Osteosarcoma of the Extremities , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  B. Fuchs,et al.  Characterization of Different Osteosarcoma Phenotypes by PET Imaging in Preclinical Animal Models , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  D. Jeon,et al.  18F-FDG PET SUVmax as an indicator of histopathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in extremity osteosarcoma , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Liu Hongtao,et al.  18F-FDG positron emission tomography for the assessment of histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcomas: a meta-analysis. , 2012, Surgical oncology.

[7]  Paul A Meyers,et al.  Outcome for adolescent and young adult patients with osteosarcoma , 2012, Cancer.

[8]  G. Treglia,et al.  The Role of Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Assessing the Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Osteosarcoma , 2012, International journal of molecular imaging.

[9]  N. Thacker,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in human tumours using MRI and PET. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[10]  L. Chukoskie,et al.  Prediction of Chemotherapy Response by PET-CT in Osteosarcoma: Correlation With Histologic Necrosis , 2011, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[11]  Shishir Rastogi,et al.  Role of MRI in osteosarcoma for evaluation and prediction of chemotherapy response: correlation with histological necrosis , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  Drew A. Torigian,et al.  Evolving role of molecular imaging with PET in detecting and characterizing heterogeneity of cancer tissue at the primary and metastatic sites, a plausible explanation for failed attempts to cure malignant disorders , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  Min Suk Kim,et al.  Prediction Model of Chemotherapy Response in Osteosarcoma by 18F-FDG PET and MRI , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Roland L Bassett,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT as an Indicator of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Osteosarcoma , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  S. Dry,et al.  Combined Assessment of Metabolic and Volumetric Changes for Assessment of Tumor Response in Patients with Soft-Tissue Sarcomas , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Reduction of Glucose Metabolic Activity Is More Accurate than Change in Size at Predicting Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  Ren-Shyan Liu,et al.  Comparison Between F‐18‐FDG Positron Emission Tomography and Histology for the Assessment of Tumor Necrosis Rates in Primary Osteosarcoma , 2006, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[18]  J. Eary,et al.  [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts outcome for Ewing sarcoma family of tumors. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  E. Kleinerman,et al.  Osteosarcoma: a randomized, prospective trial of the addition of ifosfamide and/or muramyl tripeptide to cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  A. Huvos,et al.  Intensification of preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering (T12) protocol. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  G. Rosen,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: Selection of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the response of the primary tumor to preoperative chemotherapy , 1982, Cancer.

[22]  H. Min,et al.  Prediction of tumour necrosis fractions using metabolic and volumetric 18F-FDG PET/CT indices, after one course and at the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in children and young adults with osteosarcoma , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  A. Huvos,et al.  Treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity with preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  G Rosen,et al.  Chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.