Representing and communicating deep uncertainty in climate-change assessments

IPCC reports provide a synthesis of the state of the science in order to inform the international policy process. This task is made difficult by the presence of deep uncertainty in the climate problem that results from long time scales and complexity. This paper focuses on how deep uncertainty can be effectively communicated. We argue that existing schemes do an inadequate job of communicating deep uncertainty and propose a simple approach that distinguishes between various levels of subjective understanding in a systematic manner. We illustrate our approach with two examples. To cite this article: M. Kandlikar et al., C. R. Geoscience 337 (2005).

[1]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Global Climate Change: the Mutual Construction of an Emergent Science-Policy Domain , 1995 .

[2]  Tora Skodvin,et al.  Structure and agent in the scientific diplomacy of climate change : an empirical case study of science-policy interaction in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[3]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hedging in scientific research articles , 1998 .

[4]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[5]  Raymond Murphy.  Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. (Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus) , 2003 .

[6]  K. Horn,et al.  The Consequences of Citing Hedged Statements in Scientific Research Articles , 2001 .

[7]  Raquel V. Francisco,et al.  Regional Climate Information—Evaluation and Projections , 2001 .

[8]  M. Smithson,et al.  Conflict Aversion: Preference for Ambiguity vs Conflict in Sources and Evidence. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[9]  Michael Smithson,et al.  Human Judgment under Sample Space Ignorance , 2000, ISIPTA.

[10]  James S. Risbey,et al.  Exploring the Structure of Regional Climate Scenarios by Combining Synoptic and Dynamic Guidance and GCM Output , 2002 .

[11]  Greg Myers,et al.  The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles , 1989 .

[12]  R. Prinn,et al.  Uncertainty and Climate Change Assessments , 2001, Science.

[13]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[14]  G. Clemen,et al.  The Concept of Hedging: Origins, Approaches and Definitions , 1997 .

[15]  Raija Markkanen,et al.  Hedging and discourse : approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts , 1997 .

[16]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[17]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Modeling Ambiguity in Decisions Under Uncertainty , 1988 .

[18]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. , 1978 .

[19]  Martin Manning,et al.  A Concept Paper for the AR4 Cross Cutting Theme: Uncertainties and Risk , 2003 .

[20]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Decision making under ignorance: Arguing with yourself , 1995 .

[21]  M. Hulme,et al.  Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? , 2004 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. , 1994 .