Markets for energy efficiency: Exploring the implications of an EU-wide 'Tradable White Certificate' scheme

Recent developments in European energy policy reveal an increasing interest in implementing the so-called 'Tradable White Certificate' (TWC) schemes to improve energy efficiency. Based on three evaluation criteria (cost-effectiveness, environmental effectiveness and distributional equity) this paper analyses the implications of implementing a European-wide TWC scheme targeting the household and commercial sectors. Using a bottom-up model, quantitative results show significant cost-effective potentials for improvements (ca. 1400 TWh in cumulative energy savings by 2020), with the household sector, gas and space heating representing most of the TWC supply in terms of eligible sector, fuel and energy service demand, respectively. If a single market price of negative externalities is considered, a societal cost-effective potential of energy savings above 30% (compared to the baseline) is observed. In environmental terms, the resulting greenhouse gas emission reductions are around 200 Mt CO2-eq by 2010, representing nearly 60% of the EU-Kyoto-target. From the qualitative perspective, several embedded ancillary benefits are identified (e.g. employment generation, improved comfort level, reduced 'fuel poverty', security of energy supply). Whereas an EU-wide TWC increases liquidity and reduces the risks of market power, autarky compliance strategies may be expected in order to capture co-benefits nationally. Cross subsidies could occur due to investment recovery mechanisms and there is a risk that effects may be regressive for low-income households. Assumptions undertaken by the modelling approach strongly indicate that high effectiveness of other policy instruments is needed for an EU-wide TWC scheme to be cost-effective.

[1]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  Measuring the Energy Savings from Home Improvement Investments: Evidence from Monthly Billing Data , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  José Goldemberg,et al.  Energy for sustainable development : a policy agenda , 2002 .

[3]  J. Dales,et al.  Land, Water, and Ownership , 1968 .

[4]  Chen Wenying,et al.  Future implications of China's energy-technology choices , 2003 .

[5]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  Economics and Rational Conservation Policy , 1994 .

[6]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables , 1979 .

[7]  R. Morgenstern,et al.  Can Free Information Really Accelerate Technology Diffusion , 1999 .

[8]  Manuel Frondel,et al.  Evaluating Environmental Programs: The Perspective of Modern Evaluation Research , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  H. Huntington Been top down so long it looks like bottom up to me , 1994 .

[10]  Barbara Praetorius,et al.  How much market do market-based instruments create? An analysis for the case of "white" certificates , 2003 .

[11]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory , 1972 .

[12]  Dermot Gately,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables: Comment , 1980 .

[13]  R. Newell,et al.  Information programs for technology adoption: The case of energy-efficiency audits , 2004 .

[14]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  A cultural model of household energy consumption , 1992 .

[15]  T. Tietenberg Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice , 2006 .

[16]  James E. McMahon,et al.  The Behavior of the Market for Energy Efficiency in Residential Appliances Including Heating and Cooling Equipment , 1987 .

[17]  M. Jakob Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments: The case of the Swiss residential sector , 2006 .

[18]  J. D. Khazzoom,et al.  Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances , 1980 .

[19]  Blake Johnson,et al.  Modeling energy technology choices: Which investment analysis tools are appropriate? , 1994 .

[20]  Lena Neij,et al.  Market behaviour and the to-trade-or-not-to-trade dilemma in ‘tradable white certificate’ schemes , 2008 .

[21]  Ad Seebregts,et al.  Energy/Environmental Modeling with the MARKAL Family of Models , 2002 .

[22]  E. I. Hamilton,et al.  Environment and energy: A Report of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979, 116 pp. Price: £7.50 , 1980 .

[23]  K. Train Discount rates in consumers' energy-related decisions: A review of the literature , 1985 .

[24]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Productivity in buildings: the ‘killer’ variables , 1999 .

[25]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Ex Post Evaluation of Tradable Permits, The U. S. SO2 Cap-and-Trade Program , 2003 .

[26]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? , 1994 .

[27]  Erik O. Ahlgren,et al.  Impacts of a common green certificate market on electricity and CO2-emission markets in the Nordic countries , 2005 .

[28]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  An ex-ante evaluation of a White Certificates scheme in The Netherlands: A case study for the household sector , 2007 .

[29]  Alan H. Sanstad,et al.  DISCOUNT RATES AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY , 1995 .

[30]  S. Sorrell The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency , 2007 .

[31]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption , 1984 .

[32]  Luis Mundaca,et al.  Transaction costs of Tradable White Certificate schemes: The Energy Efficiency Commitment as case study , 2007 .

[33]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology , 1994 .

[34]  Lena Neij,et al.  Market mechanisms for White Certificate Trading. IEA-DSM Task XIV Final Report. Based on National and International Studies and Experiences , 2006 .

[35]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  “White and Green”: Comparison of market-based instruments to promote energy efficiency , 2005 .

[36]  W. Baumol,et al.  The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment , 1971 .

[37]  P. Alari,et al.  The Italian energy saving obligation to gas and electricity distribution companies. Scenario and case studies calculations show high environmental and economic benefits to actors (DISCOs, ESCOs, customers) and society , 2003 .

[38]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[39]  Robin W. Gates Investing in energy conservation: Are homeowners passing up high yields? , 1983 .

[40]  P. Berkhout,et al.  Defining the rebound effect , 2000 .

[41]  R. Howarth,et al.  ‘Normal’ markets, market imperfections and energy efficiency , 1994 .

[42]  Wenying Chen,et al.  The costs of mitigating carbon emissions in China: findings from China MARKAL-MACRO modeling , 2005 .

[43]  Amulya K. N. Reddy,et al.  Barriers to improvements in energy efficiency , 1991 .

[44]  E. A. Alsema ICARUS 4 : the new database structure , 2000 .

[45]  R. Norgaard,et al.  Efficiency and sustainability in restructured electricity markets: the renewables portfolio standard , 1996 .

[46]  Jasper Becker,et al.  Joint Research Centre , 1982, Nature.

[47]  R. Sutherland Market Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Investments , 1991 .

[48]  Joel D. Scheraga,et al.  Energy and the environment : something new under the sun ? , 1994 .

[49]  J. Goldemberg World energy assessment : energy and the challenge of sustainability , 2000 .

[50]  M. Einhorn,et al.  Notes - Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency Standards for Household Appliances , 1982 .