Human breast duct anatomy, the ‘sick lobe’ hypothesis and intraductal approaches to breast cancer

SummaryIntroductionInformation about central and peripheral duct anatomy is a requirement for developing intraductal approaches to human breast cancer, but remains sparse. This study looks at the acquisition and digital modelling of data describing breast duct branching from thick (‘subgross’) sections using data structures from the neurosciences, and at high-throughput imaging of duct anatomy in the nipple.MethodsThe branching of a large breast duct system was modelled using data extracted from cleared and stained 2 mm ‘subgross’ sections of an autopsy breast using a public-domain neuron modelling program (CVAPP), and episcopic fluorescence image capture (EFIC) was used to collect a stack of 1100 autofluorescence images of ducts in a mastectomy nipple.ResultsThe duct skeleton was captured in 440 line segments with some pruning of terminal ducts. Extracting this data manually in a usable form was, however, laborious and error prone, emphasising the need for improved morphological informatics. EFIC captured anatomical detail and subsequent 3D reconstruction was consistent with the distinction between ‘type A’ and ‘type B’ nipple ducts proposed by Going and Moffat (J Pathol 203: 538–544, 2004).ConclusionsWhole-lobe duct modelling and EFIC reveal central and peripheral duct anatomy in human breast. Such knowledge is required for understanding normal breast development, the growth of cancer precursors, and for developing the intraductal approach to breast cancer.

[1]  M. Mayo,et al.  Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention. , 2005, Endocrine-related cancer.

[2]  H. Smith,et al.  Contiguous patches of normal human mammary epithelium derived from a single stem cell: implications for breast carcinogenesis. , 1996, Cancer research.

[3]  H M Jensen,et al.  An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions. , 1975, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  J C Fiala,et al.  Reconstruct: a free editor for serial section microscopy , 2005, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  J. Going,et al.  Three dimensional anatomy of complete duct systems in human breast: pathological and developmental implications. , 1996, Journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  P. Escobar,et al.  Mammary ductoscopy: current status and future prospects. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  Tibor Tot,et al.  DCIS, cytokeratins, and the theory of the sick lobe , 2005, Virchows Archiv.

[8]  W. Weninger,et al.  Phenotyping transgenic embryos: a rapid 3-D screening method based on episcopic fluorescence image capturing , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[9]  R. C Cannon,et al.  An on-line archive of reconstructed hippocampal neurons , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  A New Approach to Point Pattern Matching , 1992 .

[11]  S. Lakhani,et al.  X-inactivation patch size in human female tissue confounds the assessment of tumor clonality , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Going,et al.  Escaping from Flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimensions , 2004, The Journal of pathology.

[13]  M. Halliwell,et al.  Atlas of Ultrasound and Ductal Echography of the Breast: the Introduction of Anatomic Intelligence Into Breast Imaging , 1995 .

[14]  J C Kent,et al.  Anatomy of the lactating human breast redefined with ultrasound imaging , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[15]  Gallya Gannot,et al.  Evaluation of non-formalin tissue fixation for molecular profiling studies. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[16]  A. Templeton,et al.  Tumours of the Breast , 1894, The Hospital.

[17]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Seiichi Takenoshita,et al.  Computer‐assisted complete three‐dimensional reconstruction of the mammary ductal/lobular systems , 2001, Cancer.

[19]  Paul M. Griffin,et al.  Point pattern matching using centroid bounding , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[20]  Sanford H Barsky,et al.  Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited , 2004, Cancer.

[21]  T. Fukushima,et al.  Intraductal extension of primary invasive breast carcinoma treated by breast conservative surgery. Computer graphic three‐dimensional reconstruction of the mammary duct‐lobular systems , 1995, Cancer.

[22]  S. Love,et al.  The Fourth International Symposium on the Intraductal Approach to Breast Cancer, Santa Barbara, California, 10–13 March 2005 , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[23]  R W Powell,et al.  Team approach to the study of diseases of the breast , 1969 .

[24]  A. Feuchtinger,et al.  TO-PRO-3 is an optimal fluorescent dye for nuclear counterstaining in dual-colour FISH on paraffin sections , 2001, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[25]  M. Cutler Tumours of the Breast , 1962 .

[26]  J. Rice,et al.  Preneoplastic lesions in the human breast. , 1976, Science.

[27]  S. Wellings,et al.  Subgross pathology of the human breast: method and initial observations. , 1969, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.