The Development of an Ecosystem Services Framework for South East Queensland

Extensive research has been conducted globally into conceptual frameworks for ecosystem services, the most notable being the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being; a framework for assessment. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, pp 51, 53–55, 2005). The South East Queensland (SEQ) Ecosystem Services Framework (Australia) aims to provide the tools to enable government, industry, business, researchers, non-government organizations and land managers to apply the concept of ecosystem services in their planning and management practices. This article describes the Framework and the process that has produced matrices and maps that identify and illustrate the linkages between ecosystems, ecosystem functions, ecosystem services and the community’s well-being. The matrices and maps derived can identify areas in the region where the most ecosystem services are generated. This allows areas to be considered as valuable natural assets of the region, deserving appropriate protection measures or significant offsets if they are diminished or degraded in any way. Although the Framework requires further refinement and ongoing development, the process applied and the products produced has enabled decision makers to turn the concept of ecosystem services into practical application in SEQ.

[1]  A. Troy,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer , 2006 .

[2]  C. Kremen Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[3]  K. Wallace Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions , 2007 .

[4]  J. Boyd,et al.  Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? , 2007 .

[5]  Janet Ann ranganathan,et al.  Restoring Nature's Capital , 2007 .

[6]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[7]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[8]  Saleem H. Ali,et al.  Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being , 2007 .

[9]  Rik Leemans,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[10]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Integrating the valuation of ecosystem services into the Input–Output economics of an Alpine region , 2007 .

[11]  Noel E. Davidson,et al.  Valuing Wetlands: guidance for valuing the benefits derived from wetland ecosystem services , 2006 .

[12]  Manfred A. Max-Neef Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections , 1989 .

[13]  R. Cowling,et al.  An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[15]  Jill J. Cress,et al.  A New Map of Standardized Terrestrial Ecosystems of the Conterminous United States , 2009 .

[16]  Carl Binning,et al.  Natural Assets: An Inventory of Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Goulburn Broken Catchment , 2001 .

[17]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[18]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[19]  B. Bryan,et al.  Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services , 2009 .

[20]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Multiple objective decision methods and regional planning , 1980 .

[21]  D. Rossiter Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Management , 1995 .

[22]  R. D. de Groot,et al.  Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  Increasing social-ecological resilience by placing science at the decision table: The role of the San Pedro Basin (Arizona) decision-support system model , 2009 .

[24]  E. Barbier Valuing Ecosystem Services as Productive Inputs , 2007 .