Comparative study of the reliability of MPPT algorithms for the crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules in variable weather conditions

Abstract The crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules are widely used as power supply sources in the tropical areas where the weather conditions change abruptly. Fortunately, many MPPT algorithms are implemented to improve their performance. In the other hand, it is well known that these power supply sources are nonlinear dipoles and so, their intrinsic parameters may vary with the irradiance and the temperature. In this paper, the MPPT algorithms widely used, i.e. Perturb and Observe (P&O), Incremental Conductance (INC), Hill-Climbing (HC), are implemented using Matlab ® /Simulink ® model of a crystalline silicon photovoltaic module whose intrinsic parameters were extracted by fitting the I(V) characteristic to experimental points. Comparing the simulation results, it is obvious that the variable step size INC algorithm has the best reliability than both HC and P&O algorithms for the near to real Simulink ® model of photovoltaic modules. With a 60 Wp photovoltaic module, the daily maximum power reaches 50.76 W against 34.40 W when the photovoltaic parameters are fixed. Meanwhile, the daily average energy is 263 Wh/day against 195 Wh/day.

[1]  Carlos A. Canesin,et al.  Evaluation of the Main MPPT Techniques for Photovoltaic Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  M. Tanrioven,et al.  Matlab/Stateflow Based Modeling of MPPT Algorithms , 2014 .

[3]  Abdul Halim Mohamed Yatim,et al.  A new approach of modelling, simulation of mppt forphotovoltaic system in simulink model , 2013 .

[4]  Jae-Hoon Cho,et al.  A Variable Step Size Incremental Conductance MPPT of a Photovoltaic System Using DC-DC Converter with Direct Control Scheme , 2013 .

[5]  Basim Alsayid,et al.  Maximum Power Point Tracking Simulation for Photovoltaic Systems Using Perturb and Observe Algorithm , 2012 .

[6]  P. Wira,et al.  Simulations Based on Experimental Data of the Behaviour of a Monocrystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module , 2015 .

[7]  M. Tanrioven,et al.  Performance Comparison of Widely-Used Maximum Power Point Tracker Algorithms under Real Environmental Conditions , 2014 .

[8]  . B.Tech,et al.  Design and Modelling of PV system and Different MPPT algorithms , 2013 .

[9]  Kok Soon Tey,et al.  Modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm to mitigate inaccurate responses under fast-changing solar irradiation level , 2014 .

[10]  Saravana Selvan,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Incremental Conductance MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Applications , 2013 .

[11]  Yong Kang,et al.  A Variable Step Size INC MPPT Method for PV Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  I. William Christopher,et al.  Comparative Study of P&O and InC MPPT Algorithms , 2013 .

[13]  Anmol Ratna Regular paper Performance Analysis of P&O and Incremental Conductance MPPT Algorithms Under Rapidly Changing Weather Conditions JES , 2014 .